The infected diabetic foot: Analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic foot infections

Lawrence A. Lavery, Mehmet A. Suludere, Easton Ryan, Peter A. Crisologo, Arthur Tarricone, Matthew Malone, Orhan K. Oz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of moderate and severe foot infections in people with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). We retrospectively evaluated 382 patients (77% with DM and 23% non-DM). We collected demographic data, co-morbidities and one-year outcomes including healing, surgical interventions, number of surgeries, length of stay, re-infection and re-hospitalisation. DM patients required more surgeries (2.3 ± 2.2 vs. 1.7 ± 1.3, p = 0.01), but did not have a longer hospital length of stay during the index hospitalisation (DM 10.9 days ±9.2 vs. non-DM = 8.8 days ±5.8, p = 0.43). After the index hospitalisation, DM patients had increased rates of re-hospitalisation for any reason (63.3% vs. 35.2%, CI 1.9–5.2, OR 3.2, p < 0.01), re-infection at the index wound infection site (48% vs. 30.7%, CI 1.3–3.5, OR 2.1, p < 0.01), re-hospitalisation for a foot pathology (47.3% vs. 29.5%, CI 1.3–3.6, OR 2.1, p < 0.01), and longer times to ulcer healing (151.8 days ±108.8 vs. 108.8 ± 90.6 days, p = 0.04). Patients with DM admitted to hospital with foot infections have worse clinical outcomes during the index hospitalisation and are more likely to have re-infection and re-admission to hospital in the next year.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)360-365
Number of pages6
JournalWound Repair and Regeneration
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2024

Keywords

  • amputation
  • diabetic foot
  • infection
  • osteomyelitis
  • outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The infected diabetic foot: Analysis of diabetic and non-diabetic foot infections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this