TY - JOUR
T1 - Subjective neuroleptic response and treatment outcome under open and double-blind conditions - A preliminary report
AU - Pi, Edmond
AU - Sramek, John
AU - Johnson, Tram
AU - Herrera, John
AU - Heh, Chris
AU - Costa, Jerome
AU - Cutler, Neal
AU - Ananth, Jambur
PY - 1990
Y1 - 1990
N2 - Pi Edmond, John Sramek, Tram Johnson, John Herrera, Chris Heh, Jerome Costa, Neal Cutler and Jambur Ananth: Subjective Neuroleptic Response and Treatment Outcome Under Open and Double-Blind Conditions: A Preliminary Report. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. & Biol. Psychiat. 1990, 14: 921-928. 1. 1. A patient's early subjective response to a neuroleptic was recorded in 17 schizophrenic patients following a fixed dose of neuroleptic under both open and double-blind placebo-controlled conditions. 2. 2. High correlations were found between a patient's subjective response at 2.5, 24 and 48 hours after the initial dose, suggesting that the timing of the initial subjective response rating is not critical. 3. 3. The relationship between the psychiatric improvement and subjective response was not significant under double-blind conditions (r = 0.004), while the relationship under the open condition showed a trend towards significance comparable to earlier reports (r = 0.32). 4. 4. The findings question the usefulness of applying early subjective response to a neuroleptic to predict clinical improvement.
AB - Pi Edmond, John Sramek, Tram Johnson, John Herrera, Chris Heh, Jerome Costa, Neal Cutler and Jambur Ananth: Subjective Neuroleptic Response and Treatment Outcome Under Open and Double-Blind Conditions: A Preliminary Report. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. & Biol. Psychiat. 1990, 14: 921-928. 1. 1. A patient's early subjective response to a neuroleptic was recorded in 17 schizophrenic patients following a fixed dose of neuroleptic under both open and double-blind placebo-controlled conditions. 2. 2. High correlations were found between a patient's subjective response at 2.5, 24 and 48 hours after the initial dose, suggesting that the timing of the initial subjective response rating is not critical. 3. 3. The relationship between the psychiatric improvement and subjective response was not significant under double-blind conditions (r = 0.004), while the relationship under the open condition showed a trend towards significance comparable to earlier reports (r = 0.32). 4. 4. The findings question the usefulness of applying early subjective response to a neuroleptic to predict clinical improvement.
KW - initial subjective response
KW - neuroleptics
KW - subjective response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025044152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025044152&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0278-5846(90)90077-T
DO - 10.1016/0278-5846(90)90077-T
M3 - Article
C2 - 1980542
AN - SCOPUS:0025044152
SN - 0278-5846
VL - 14
SP - 921
EP - 928
JO - Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
JF - Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -