Sensitivity and Specificity of Intraoperative TransImpedance Matrix Recordings Compared With X-ray Imaging in Detecting Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Tip Foldovers: A Multicenter Study

Alexandra M. Arambula, Robin Piper, Gail Murray, Sarah E. Mowry, Alejandro Rivas, Maroun Semaan, Nauman F. Manzoor, Daniel E. Killeen, David C. Kelsall, J. Eric Lupo, Allison Biever, Katrina R. Stidham, Regina Albinus, Samantha Morgan, Brian J. Kaplan, Regina Presley, Sarah Menendez, Viral D. Tejani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective Characterize the sensitivity and specificity of TransImpedance Matrix (TIM) recordings compared with x-rays in detecting cochlear implant tip foldovers. Study Design Retrospective. Setting Multi-institutional, academic and private surgery centers. Patients Patients 6 months and older undergoing cochlear implantation. Interventions After cochlear implant array insertion, intraoperative TIM recordings and x-rays were conducted to confirm appropriate placement. If a foldover was identified, repeat insertion, followed by TIM and x-ray, was performed. Main Outcome Measures Presence of tip foldovers as determined by TIM recordings and x-rays. Results There were 13 tip foldovers out of 484 insertions, yielding a 2.7% tip foldover rate. Using x-rays as the "gold standard,"TIM recordings showed 100% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 84.6% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predicative value in detecting tip foldovers. The x-ray images for two TIM-identified tip foldovers were interpreted as normal intraoperatively (apparent false positives), but then were interpreted as foldovers when presented to the operating surgeon postoperatively in a blinded fashion. If these false positives had been reclassified as true positives, TIM specificity and PPV would both improve to 100%. Conclusions These results provide further support regarding the utility of TIM recordings to evaluate appropriate cochlear implant electrode array position. Despite the low tip foldover rate reported across the literature and within this study, this multicenter patient group provided a large sample size to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of TIM recordings in identifying tip foldovers. Compared with the reference-standard, x-ray imaging, TIM recordings show equivalent, and in some cases superior, performance in identification of tip foldovers. Thus, use of TIM can potentially preclude the need for routine intraoperative x-rays without compromising patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)627-633
Number of pages7
JournalOtology and Neurotology
Volume46
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2025

Keywords

  • Cochlear implant
  • Electrophysiology
  • Tip foldover
  • TransImpedance Matrix

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitivity and Specificity of Intraoperative TransImpedance Matrix Recordings Compared With X-ray Imaging in Detecting Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Tip Foldovers: A Multicenter Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this