Abstract
Background: Inclusion body myositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and the most common myopathy affecting people older than 50 years. To date, there are no effective drug treatments. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of bimagrumab—a fully human monoclonal antibody—in individuals with inclusion body myositis. Methods: We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (RESILIENT) at 38 academic clinical sites in Australia, Europe, Japan, and the USA. Individuals (aged 36–85 years) were eligible for the study if they met modified 2010 Medical Research Council criteria for inclusion body myositis. We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1:1) using a blocked randomisation schedule (block size of four) to either bimagrumab (10 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg) or placebo matched in appearance to bimagrumab, administered as intravenous infusions every 4 weeks for at least 48 weeks. All study participants, the funder, investigators, site personnel, and people doing assessments were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome measure was 6-min walking distance (6MWD), which was assessed at week 52 in the primary analysis population and analysed by intention-to-treat principles. We used a multivariate normal repeated measures model to analyse data for 6MWD. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and by electrocardiography, echocardiography, haematological testing, urinalysis, and blood chemistry. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01925209; this report represents the final analysis. Findings: Between Sept 26, 2013, and Jan 6, 2016, 251 participants were enrolled to the study, of whom 63 were assigned to each bimagrumab group and 62 were allocated to the placebo group. At week 52, 6MWD change from baseline did not differ between any bimagrumab dose and placebo (least squares mean treatment difference for bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 17·6 m, SE 14·3, 99% CI –19·6 to 54·8; p=0·22; for 3 mg/kg group, 18·6 m, 14·2, –18·2 to 55·4; p=0·19; and for 1 mg/kg group, –1·3 m, 14·1, –38·0 to 35·4; p=0·93). 63 (100%) participants in each bimagrumab group and 61 (98%) of 62 in the placebo group had at least one adverse event. Falls were the most frequent adverse event (48 [76%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 55 [87%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 54 [86%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 52 [84%] in the placebo group). The most frequently reported adverse events with bimagrumab were muscle spasms (32 [51%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 43 [68%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 25 [40%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 13 [21%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (33 [52%], 28 [44%], 20 [32%], and 11 [18%], respectively). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in four (6%) participants in each bimagrumab group compared with one (2%) participant in the placebo group. At least one serious adverse event was reported by 21 (33%) participants in the 10 mg/kg group, 11 (17%) in the 3 mg/kg group, 20 (32%) in the 1 mg/kg group, and 20 (32%) in the placebo group. No significant adverse cardiac effects were recorded on electrocardiography or echocardiography. Two deaths were reported during the study, one attributable to subendocardial myocardial infarction (secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding after an intentional overdose of concomitant sedatives and antidepressants) and one attributable to lung adenocarcinoma. Neither death was considered by the investigator to be related to bimagrumab. Interpretation: Bimagrumab showed a good safety profile, relative to placebo, in individuals with inclusion body myositis but did not improve 6MWD. The strengths of our study are that, to the best of our knowledge, it is the largest randomised controlled trial done in people with inclusion body myositis, and it provides important natural history data over 12 months. Funding: Novartis Pharma.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 834-844 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | The Lancet Neurology |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 2019 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Clinical Neurology
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Safety and efficacy of intravenous bimagrumab in inclusion body myositis (RESILIENT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: The Lancet Neurology, Vol. 18, No. 9, 09.2019, p. 834-844.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and efficacy of intravenous bimagrumab in inclusion body myositis (RESILIENT)
T2 - a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial
AU - Hanna, Michael G.
AU - Badrising, Umesh A.
AU - Benveniste, Olivier
AU - Lloyd, Thomas E.
AU - Needham, Merrilee
AU - Chinoy, Hector
AU - Aoki, Masashi
AU - Machado, Pedro M.
AU - Liang, Christina
AU - Reardon, Katrina A.
AU - de Visser, Marianne
AU - Ascherman, Dana P.
AU - Barohn, Richard J.
AU - Dimachkie, Mazen M.
AU - Miller, James A.L.
AU - Kissel, John T.
AU - Oskarsson, Björn
AU - Joyce, Nanette C.
AU - Van den Bergh, P.
AU - Baets, Jonathan
AU - De Bleecker, J. L.
AU - Karam, Chafic
AU - David, William S.
AU - Mirabella, Massimiliano
AU - Nations, Sharon P.
AU - Jung, Hans H.
AU - Pegoraro, E.
AU - Maggi, Lorenzo
AU - Rodolico, Carmelo
AU - Filosto, Massimiliano
AU - Shaibani, Aziz I.
AU - Sivakumar, Kumaraswamy
AU - Goyal, Namita A.
AU - Mori-Yoshimura, Madoka
AU - Yamashita, Satoshi
AU - Suzuki, N.
AU - Katsuno, Masahisa
AU - Murata, K.
AU - Nodera, Hiroyuki
AU - Nishino, Ichizo
AU - Romano, Carla D.
AU - Williams, Valerie S.L.
AU - Vissing, John
AU - Auberson, Lixin Zhang
AU - Wu, Min
AU - de Vera, Ana
AU - Papanicolaou, Dimitris A.
AU - Amato, Anthony A.
N1 - Funding Information: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma (Basel, Switzerland). We thank all investigators, co-investigators, and study coordinators of the RESILIENT Study Group; members of the trial steering committee; data monitoring committee members; and adjudication committee members. Medical writing assistance was provided by K Ananda Krishna and funded by Novartis Healthcare. MGH is supported by a Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre grant (MR/K000608/1). PMM was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. HC is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and MRC grant (MR/N003322/1). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health. We acknowledge the contribution of Satoshi Nakano, who was principal investigator at the Osaka City General Hospital (Osaka, Japan) and who passed away in 2017. Funding Information: This study was funded by Novartis Pharma (Basel, Switzerland). We thank all investigators, co-investigators, and study coordinators of the RESILIENT Study Group; members of the trial steering committee; data monitoring committee members; and adjudication committee members. Medical writing assistance was provided by K Ananda Krishna and funded by Novartis Healthcare. MGH is supported by a Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre grant (MR/K000608/1). PMM was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. HC is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre and MRC grant (MR/N003322/1). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the UK National Health Service, the NIHR, or the UK Department of Health. We acknowledge the contribution of Satoshi Nakano, who was principal investigator at the Osaka City General Hospital (Osaka, Japan) and who passed away in 2017. Funding Information: MGH has served on an advisory board for and received reimbursement from Novartis. UAB declares reimbursement of study costs paid to his institution from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; and consultancy fees paid to his institution from Argen X, outside of the submitted work. OB declares grants and personal fees from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; grants and non-financial support from Shire, outside of the submitted work; personal fees and non-financial support from LFB and CSL Behring, outside of the submitted work; and grants and personal fees from Neovacs, outside of the submitted work. TEL declares grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Novartis, during the conduct of the study. MN has served on an advisory board for Novartis during the initial study design. HC declares grants from the University of Manchester, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and grants from UCB, outside of the submitted work; personal fees from Lilly and Momenta, outside of the submitted work; travel support from Janssen and Abbvie, outside of the submitted work; personal compensation for being a speaker or advisory board member from Novartis, UCB, Lilly, and Momenta, outside of the submitted work; and travel support from Abbvie and Janssen, outside of the submitted work. MA declares research grants from the Japanese Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare, the National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company, Sanofi, Novartis Pharma, and Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma, during the conduct of the study. PMM declares personal fees from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; and personal fees from AbbVie, Centocor, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, outside of the submitted work. CL declares compensation for attending investigator meetings from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; and compensation for attending investigator meetings from Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside of the submitted work. KAR reports grants from Novartis, during the conduct of the study. MdV declares personal fees from Avexis and Bristol-Myers Squibb, outside of the submitted work. RJB has served as a consultant for NuFactor and Momenta Pharmaceutical, outside of the submitted work; and declares research support from PTC Therapeutics, Ra Pharma, Orphazyme, Sanofi Genzyme, the US Food and Drug Administration Office of Orphan Products Development, the National Institutes of Health, and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, outside of the submitted work. MMD declares grants from University of Kansas Medical Center, during the conduct of the study; consultancy or speaker's fees from Alnylam, Audentes, Biomarin, Catalyst, CSL-Behring, Genzyme, Mallinckrodt, Momenta, Novartis, NuFactor, Octapharma, Sanofi, Shire, and Terumo, outside of the submitted work; and grants from Alexion, Alnylam, Amicus, Biomarin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Catalyst, CSL-Behring, the US Food and Drug Administration Office of Orphan Products Development, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Grifols, MDA, the National Institutes of Health, Novartis, Genzyme, Octapharma, UCB Biopharma, Viromed, and TMA, outside of the submitted work. JALM declares speaker's fees or compensation for advisory board membership from CSL Bering, Octapharma, and Grifols, outside of the submitted work. JTK declares grants from Cytokinetics, Genzyme, Alexion, Novartis, and AveXis, outside of the submitted work. BO declares research support from Novartis, Biogen, Genentech, GSK, Flexpharma and consulting from Biogen and Mitsubishi Tanabe. NCJ declares support for this clinical trial from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; support for running a clinical trial and personal fees from Biogen, outside of the submitted work; and support for running a clinical trial from Acceleron, Cytokinetics, and FlexPharma, outside of the submitted work. PVdB reports personal fees from Genzyme, Pfizer, Alnylam, CSL Behring, LFB France, and UCB Pharma, outside of the submitted work. JB reports personal fees and travel support from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; and consultancy fees from Sanofi and CSL Behring, outside of the submitted work. MM declares grants, personal fees, consultancy or speaking fees, research support, travel grants, and reimbursement for participation in scientific advisory boards from Bayer Schering, Biogen, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, TEVA, Ultragenix, and Merck Serono, outside of the submitted work; and travel grants and reimbursement for participation in scientific advisory boards from CSL Behring, outside of the submitted work. SPN declares personal fees from Grifols and Bio Products Laboratory, outside of the submitted work. EP declares grants and non-financial support from Santhera, outside of the submitted work; personal fees from Sarepta and Roche, outside of the submitted work; non-financial support from Genzyme, outside of the submitted work; and grants from PTC Pharmaceuticals, outside of the submitted work. LM declares support related to running of this clinical trial from Novartis Pharma, during the conduct of the study; and grants from Sanofi Genzyme, outside of the submitted work. NAG has served on an advisory board for Novartis. MK declares a clinical trial fee from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Novartis, Daiichi-Sankyo, Sumitomo Dainippon, Takeda, and Tanabe-Mitsubishi, outside of the submitted work; grants from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Japanese Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare, the Naito Foundation, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, Otsuka, Nihonseiyaku, Sanofi, Astellas, Sumitomo Dainippon, and Pfizer, outside of the submitted work; and patent loyalty from Takeda, outside of the submitted work. IN declares grants from Astellas Pharma and Daiichi Sankyo, outside of the submitted work; grants and personal fees from Sanofi Japan, outside of the submitted work; and personal fees from Japan Blood Products Organization and Eisai, outside of the submitted work. CDR and VSLW declare support for doing this clinical trial from Novartis, during the conduct of the study; collaborated with Novartis on the development of the Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis Physical Functioning Assessment (sIFA) before this study; and are both employed by RTI Health Solutions, which runs research projects for multiple pharma and biotech companies. JV declares support for doing this clinical trial from Novartis, during the conduct of the study. LZA, AdV, MW, and DAP are employees of Novartis. MW and DAP hold stock or shares in Novartis. AAA declares personal fees from Novartis, during the conduct of the study. DPA, JLDB, CK, WSD, HHJ, CR, MF, AIS, KS, MM-Y, SY, NS, KM, and HN declare no competing interests. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2019/9
Y1 - 2019/9
N2 - Background: Inclusion body myositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and the most common myopathy affecting people older than 50 years. To date, there are no effective drug treatments. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of bimagrumab—a fully human monoclonal antibody—in individuals with inclusion body myositis. Methods: We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (RESILIENT) at 38 academic clinical sites in Australia, Europe, Japan, and the USA. Individuals (aged 36–85 years) were eligible for the study if they met modified 2010 Medical Research Council criteria for inclusion body myositis. We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1:1) using a blocked randomisation schedule (block size of four) to either bimagrumab (10 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg) or placebo matched in appearance to bimagrumab, administered as intravenous infusions every 4 weeks for at least 48 weeks. All study participants, the funder, investigators, site personnel, and people doing assessments were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome measure was 6-min walking distance (6MWD), which was assessed at week 52 in the primary analysis population and analysed by intention-to-treat principles. We used a multivariate normal repeated measures model to analyse data for 6MWD. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and by electrocardiography, echocardiography, haematological testing, urinalysis, and blood chemistry. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01925209; this report represents the final analysis. Findings: Between Sept 26, 2013, and Jan 6, 2016, 251 participants were enrolled to the study, of whom 63 were assigned to each bimagrumab group and 62 were allocated to the placebo group. At week 52, 6MWD change from baseline did not differ between any bimagrumab dose and placebo (least squares mean treatment difference for bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 17·6 m, SE 14·3, 99% CI –19·6 to 54·8; p=0·22; for 3 mg/kg group, 18·6 m, 14·2, –18·2 to 55·4; p=0·19; and for 1 mg/kg group, –1·3 m, 14·1, –38·0 to 35·4; p=0·93). 63 (100%) participants in each bimagrumab group and 61 (98%) of 62 in the placebo group had at least one adverse event. Falls were the most frequent adverse event (48 [76%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 55 [87%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 54 [86%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 52 [84%] in the placebo group). The most frequently reported adverse events with bimagrumab were muscle spasms (32 [51%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 43 [68%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 25 [40%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 13 [21%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (33 [52%], 28 [44%], 20 [32%], and 11 [18%], respectively). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in four (6%) participants in each bimagrumab group compared with one (2%) participant in the placebo group. At least one serious adverse event was reported by 21 (33%) participants in the 10 mg/kg group, 11 (17%) in the 3 mg/kg group, 20 (32%) in the 1 mg/kg group, and 20 (32%) in the placebo group. No significant adverse cardiac effects were recorded on electrocardiography or echocardiography. Two deaths were reported during the study, one attributable to subendocardial myocardial infarction (secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding after an intentional overdose of concomitant sedatives and antidepressants) and one attributable to lung adenocarcinoma. Neither death was considered by the investigator to be related to bimagrumab. Interpretation: Bimagrumab showed a good safety profile, relative to placebo, in individuals with inclusion body myositis but did not improve 6MWD. The strengths of our study are that, to the best of our knowledge, it is the largest randomised controlled trial done in people with inclusion body myositis, and it provides important natural history data over 12 months. Funding: Novartis Pharma.
AB - Background: Inclusion body myositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and the most common myopathy affecting people older than 50 years. To date, there are no effective drug treatments. We aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of bimagrumab—a fully human monoclonal antibody—in individuals with inclusion body myositis. Methods: We did a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (RESILIENT) at 38 academic clinical sites in Australia, Europe, Japan, and the USA. Individuals (aged 36–85 years) were eligible for the study if they met modified 2010 Medical Research Council criteria for inclusion body myositis. We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1:1) using a blocked randomisation schedule (block size of four) to either bimagrumab (10 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, or 1 mg/kg) or placebo matched in appearance to bimagrumab, administered as intravenous infusions every 4 weeks for at least 48 weeks. All study participants, the funder, investigators, site personnel, and people doing assessments were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome measure was 6-min walking distance (6MWD), which was assessed at week 52 in the primary analysis population and analysed by intention-to-treat principles. We used a multivariate normal repeated measures model to analyse data for 6MWD. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events and by electrocardiography, echocardiography, haematological testing, urinalysis, and blood chemistry. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01925209; this report represents the final analysis. Findings: Between Sept 26, 2013, and Jan 6, 2016, 251 participants were enrolled to the study, of whom 63 were assigned to each bimagrumab group and 62 were allocated to the placebo group. At week 52, 6MWD change from baseline did not differ between any bimagrumab dose and placebo (least squares mean treatment difference for bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 17·6 m, SE 14·3, 99% CI –19·6 to 54·8; p=0·22; for 3 mg/kg group, 18·6 m, 14·2, –18·2 to 55·4; p=0·19; and for 1 mg/kg group, –1·3 m, 14·1, –38·0 to 35·4; p=0·93). 63 (100%) participants in each bimagrumab group and 61 (98%) of 62 in the placebo group had at least one adverse event. Falls were the most frequent adverse event (48 [76%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 55 [87%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 54 [86%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 52 [84%] in the placebo group). The most frequently reported adverse events with bimagrumab were muscle spasms (32 [51%] in the bimagrumab 10 mg/kg group, 43 [68%] in the 3 mg/kg group, 25 [40%] in the 1 mg/kg group, and 13 [21%] in the placebo group) and diarrhoea (33 [52%], 28 [44%], 20 [32%], and 11 [18%], respectively). Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in four (6%) participants in each bimagrumab group compared with one (2%) participant in the placebo group. At least one serious adverse event was reported by 21 (33%) participants in the 10 mg/kg group, 11 (17%) in the 3 mg/kg group, 20 (32%) in the 1 mg/kg group, and 20 (32%) in the placebo group. No significant adverse cardiac effects were recorded on electrocardiography or echocardiography. Two deaths were reported during the study, one attributable to subendocardial myocardial infarction (secondary to gastrointestinal bleeding after an intentional overdose of concomitant sedatives and antidepressants) and one attributable to lung adenocarcinoma. Neither death was considered by the investigator to be related to bimagrumab. Interpretation: Bimagrumab showed a good safety profile, relative to placebo, in individuals with inclusion body myositis but did not improve 6MWD. The strengths of our study are that, to the best of our knowledge, it is the largest randomised controlled trial done in people with inclusion body myositis, and it provides important natural history data over 12 months. Funding: Novartis Pharma.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071282193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071282193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30200-5
DO - 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30200-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 31397289
AN - SCOPUS:85071282193
SN - 1474-4422
VL - 18
SP - 834
EP - 844
JO - The Lancet Neurology
JF - The Lancet Neurology
IS - 9
ER -