TY - JOUR
T1 - Safety and effectiveness of antithrombotic strategies in older adult patients with atrial fibrillation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction
AU - Fosbol, Emil L.
AU - Wang, Tracy Y.
AU - Li, Shuang
AU - Piccini, Jonathan P.
AU - Lopes, Renato D.
AU - Shah, Bimal
AU - Mills, Roger M.
AU - Klaskala, Winslow
AU - Alexander, Karen P.
AU - Thomas, Laine
AU - Roe, Matthew T.
AU - Peterson, Eric D.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Wang reports receiving research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi Pharmaceuticals Partnership, Schering Plough/Merck, The Medicines Co, Heartscape, Canyon Pharmaceuticals, and Eli Lilly/Daiichi Sankyo Alliance, as well as consulting fees or honoraria from Medco and Astra Zeneca. All conflicts of interest are listed at https://www.dcri.org/about-us/conflict-of-interest .
Funding Information:
Dr Peterson reports receiving research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Sanofi-Aventis, Merck, Eli Lilly, and Johnson & Johnson.
Funding Information:
Dr Piccini reports receiving research funding from Bayer Healthcare and Johnson & Johnson.
Funding Information:
Funding: This work was supported by an award from the American Heart Association-Pharmaceutical Roundtable and David and Stevie Spina and by a separate grant from Janssen Pharmaceuticals Scientific Affairs, LLC.
Funding Information:
Dr Roe reports receiving research funding from Eli Lilly, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, the American College of Cardiology, and the American Heart Association, as well as consulting fees or honoraria from KAI Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck, Orexigen, Helsinn Pharmaceuticals, Astra Zeneca, and Regeneron. All conflicts of interest are listed at https://www.dcri.org/about-us/conflict-of-interest .
Funding Information:
Dr Lopes reports receiving research funding from Bristol-Myers Squibb.
PY - 2012/4
Y1 - 2012/4
N2 - Background: We aimed to study the comparative safety and effectiveness of various antithrombotic treatment strategies among older adults with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Using the CRUSADE registry linked to longitudinal Medicare claims data, we examined NSTEMI patients aged ≥ 65 years with a concomitant diagnosis of AF. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to compare risk of rehospitalization for bleeding and a major cardiac composite end point of death, readmission for myocardial infarction, or stroke, according to discharge antithrombotic strategy. Results: Among 7619 NSTEMI patients with AF, 29% were discharged on aspirin alone; 37%, on aspirin + clopidogrel; 7%, on warfarin alone; 17%, on aspirin + warfarin; and 10%, on warfarin + aspirin + clopidogrel. There was no difference in predicted stroke risk between groups. By 1 year, 12.2% of patients were rehospitalized for bleeding, and 33.1% had a major cardiac event. Relative to aspirin alone, antithrombotic intensification was associated with increased bleeding risk (aspirin + clopidogrel adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.46 and warfarin + aspirin HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21-1.80). Patients treated with aspirin + clopidogrel + warfarin had the highest observed bleeding risk (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.30-2.10). One-year risk of the major cardiac end point was similar between groups, although, relative to aspirin only, there was a trend toward lower risk for the warfarin + aspirin group (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00). Conclusions: Older NSTEMI patients with AF are at high risk for subsequent bleeding and major cardiac events. Increased antithrombotic management was associated with increased bleeding risk. Further investigation is needed to clarify whether these risks are counterbalanced by reduced thromboembolic events in this population.
AB - Background: We aimed to study the comparative safety and effectiveness of various antithrombotic treatment strategies among older adults with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: Using the CRUSADE registry linked to longitudinal Medicare claims data, we examined NSTEMI patients aged ≥ 65 years with a concomitant diagnosis of AF. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to compare risk of rehospitalization for bleeding and a major cardiac composite end point of death, readmission for myocardial infarction, or stroke, according to discharge antithrombotic strategy. Results: Among 7619 NSTEMI patients with AF, 29% were discharged on aspirin alone; 37%, on aspirin + clopidogrel; 7%, on warfarin alone; 17%, on aspirin + warfarin; and 10%, on warfarin + aspirin + clopidogrel. There was no difference in predicted stroke risk between groups. By 1 year, 12.2% of patients were rehospitalized for bleeding, and 33.1% had a major cardiac event. Relative to aspirin alone, antithrombotic intensification was associated with increased bleeding risk (aspirin + clopidogrel adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03-1.46 and warfarin + aspirin HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21-1.80). Patients treated with aspirin + clopidogrel + warfarin had the highest observed bleeding risk (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.30-2.10). One-year risk of the major cardiac end point was similar between groups, although, relative to aspirin only, there was a trend toward lower risk for the warfarin + aspirin group (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00). Conclusions: Older NSTEMI patients with AF are at high risk for subsequent bleeding and major cardiac events. Increased antithrombotic management was associated with increased bleeding risk. Further investigation is needed to clarify whether these risks are counterbalanced by reduced thromboembolic events in this population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862776576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862776576&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 22520540
AN - SCOPUS:84862776576
SN - 0002-8703
VL - 163
SP - 720
EP - 728
JO - American Heart Journal
JF - American Heart Journal
IS - 4
ER -