Abstract
Summary: There have been a variety of techniques describing nasal tip refinement. The cephalic trim has long been accepted as a means for shaping the nasal tip, but it has been misinterpreted by many surgeons. The improper use of a cephalic trim poses potential long-term sequelae. During analysis of the nasal tip, several anatomic findings must be noted to ensure appropriate correction as well as to avoid pitfalls. These findings include the type of boxy tip or bulbous tip, cartilage strength, and the skin quality. The goal of this article is to describe five types of cephalic trim techniques to assist in refining the nasal tip and an algorithm for selection of the appropriate technique based on these anatomic findings.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 89-96 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Plastic and reconstructive surgery |
Volume | 137 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 1 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Surgery