TY - JOUR
T1 - Remote versus face-to-face neuropsychological testing for dementia research
T2 - a comparative study in people with Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and healthy older individuals
AU - Requena-Komuro, Maï Carmen
AU - Jiang, Jessica
AU - Dobson, Lucianne
AU - Benhamou, Elia
AU - Russell, Lucy
AU - Bond, Rebecca L.
AU - Brotherhood, Emilie V.
AU - Greaves, Caroline
AU - Barker, Suzie
AU - Rohrer, Jonathan D.
AU - Crutch, Sebastian J.
AU - Warren, Jason D.
AU - Hardy, Chris J.D.
N1 - Funding Information:
The Dementia Research Centre is supported by Alzheimer's Research UK, Brain Research UK and the Wolfson Foundation. This work was supported by the Alzheimer’s Society, the Royal National Institute for Deaf People, Alzheimer’s Research UK, the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre and the University College London Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre (grant PR/ylr/18575). M-CR-K was supported by a Wellcome Trust PhD Studentship (102129/B/13/Z). JJ is supported by a Frontotemporal Dementia Research Studentship in Memory of David Blechner (funded through the National Brain Appeal). EB was supported by a Brain Research UK PhD Studentship. RLB was supported by an MRC PhD Studentship in Mental Health. SC was supported by grants from ESRC-NIHR (ES/L001810/1), EPSRC (EP/M006093/1) and Wellcome Trust (200783). CH was supported by a Royal National Institute for Deaf People–Dunhill Medical Trust Pauline Ashley Fellowship (grant PA23_Hardy) and a Wellcome Institutional Strategic Support Fund Award (204841/Z/16/Z). This research was funded in part by UKRI and the Wellcome Trust (grant 204841/Z/16/Z). For the purpose of Open Access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2022/11/25
Y1 - 2022/11/25
N2 - Objectives We explored whether adapting neuropsychological tests for online administration during the COVID-19 pandemic was feasible for dementia research. Design We used a longitudinal design for healthy controls, who completed face-to-face assessments 3-4 years before remote assessments. For patients, we used a cross-sectional design, contrasting a prospective remote cohort with a retrospective face-to-face cohort matched for age/education/severity. Setting Remote assessments were conducted using video-conferencing/online testing platforms, with participants using a personal computer/tablet at home. Face-to-face assessments were conducted in testing rooms at our research centre. Participants The remote cohort comprised 25 patients (n=8 Alzheimer's disease (AD); n=3 behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD); n=4 semantic dementia (SD); n=5 progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA); n=5 logopenic aphasia (LPA)). The face-to-face patient cohort comprised 64 patients (n=25 AD; n=12 bvFTD; n=9 SD; n=12 PNFA; n=6 LPA). Ten controls who previously participated in face-to-face research also took part remotely. Outcome measures The outcome measures comprised the strength of evidence under a Bayesian framework for differences in performances between testing environments on general neuropsychological and neurolinguistic measures. Results There was substantial evidence suggesting no difference across environments in both the healthy control and combined patient cohorts (including measures of working memory, single-word comprehension, arithmetic and naming; Bayes Factors (BF) 01 >3), in the healthy control group alone (including measures of letter/category fluency, semantic knowledge and bisyllabic word repetition; all BF 01 >3), and in the combined patient cohort alone (including measures of working memory, episodic memory, short-term verbal memory, visual perception, non-word reading, sentence comprehension and bisyllabic/trisyllabic word repetition; all BF 01 >3). In the control cohort alone, there was substantial evidence in support of a difference across environments for tests of visual perception (BF 01 =0.0404) and monosyllabic word repetition (BF 01 =0.0487). Conclusions Our findings suggest that remote delivery of neuropsychological tests for dementia research is feasible.
AB - Objectives We explored whether adapting neuropsychological tests for online administration during the COVID-19 pandemic was feasible for dementia research. Design We used a longitudinal design for healthy controls, who completed face-to-face assessments 3-4 years before remote assessments. For patients, we used a cross-sectional design, contrasting a prospective remote cohort with a retrospective face-to-face cohort matched for age/education/severity. Setting Remote assessments were conducted using video-conferencing/online testing platforms, with participants using a personal computer/tablet at home. Face-to-face assessments were conducted in testing rooms at our research centre. Participants The remote cohort comprised 25 patients (n=8 Alzheimer's disease (AD); n=3 behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD); n=4 semantic dementia (SD); n=5 progressive non-fluent aphasia (PNFA); n=5 logopenic aphasia (LPA)). The face-to-face patient cohort comprised 64 patients (n=25 AD; n=12 bvFTD; n=9 SD; n=12 PNFA; n=6 LPA). Ten controls who previously participated in face-to-face research also took part remotely. Outcome measures The outcome measures comprised the strength of evidence under a Bayesian framework for differences in performances between testing environments on general neuropsychological and neurolinguistic measures. Results There was substantial evidence suggesting no difference across environments in both the healthy control and combined patient cohorts (including measures of working memory, single-word comprehension, arithmetic and naming; Bayes Factors (BF) 01 >3), in the healthy control group alone (including measures of letter/category fluency, semantic knowledge and bisyllabic word repetition; all BF 01 >3), and in the combined patient cohort alone (including measures of working memory, episodic memory, short-term verbal memory, visual perception, non-word reading, sentence comprehension and bisyllabic/trisyllabic word repetition; all BF 01 >3). In the control cohort alone, there was substantial evidence in support of a difference across environments for tests of visual perception (BF 01 =0.0404) and monosyllabic word repetition (BF 01 =0.0487). Conclusions Our findings suggest that remote delivery of neuropsychological tests for dementia research is feasible.
KW - Adult neurology
KW - Dementia
KW - Telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142940520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85142940520&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064576
DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064576
M3 - Article
C2 - 36428012
AN - SCOPUS:85142940520
SN - 2044-6055
VL - 12
JO - BMJ Open
JF - BMJ Open
IS - 11
M1 - e064576
ER -