TY - JOUR
T1 - Relational Anatomy of the Mimetic Muscles and Its Implications on Free Functional Muscle Inset in Facial Reanimation
AU - Zabojova, Jorga
AU - Thrikutam, Nikhitha
AU - Tolley, Philip
AU - Perez, Justin
AU - Rozen, Shai M.
AU - Rodriguez-Lorenzo, Andres
N1 - Funding Information:
Received December 8, 2017, and accepted for publication, after revision March 21, 2018. From the *Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital; and †Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and ‡Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: This work was partially funded by Nyströms Amerikastipendium awarded to A.R.L. Reprints: Andres Rodriguez-Lorenzo, MD, PhD, Department of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala, Sweden 75185. E-mail: andres.rodriguez.lorenzo@surgsci.uu.se. Copyright © 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. ISSN: 0148-7043/18/8102–0203 DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001507
Publisher Copyright:
© Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/8/1
Y1 - 2018/8/1
N2 - Background The human smile is a complex coordinated activity of mimetic muscles predominantly recognizable by a superolateral pull at the commissure and elevation of the upper lip. The aim of this study was to revisit the muscles of facial expression responsible for these motions, evaluate their relational anatomy and orientation, and relate this to optimal positioning of free muscle transfer in smile reanimation. Methods Nineteen hemifaces from fresh cadaveric specimens were dissected. A subsuperficial muscular aponeurotic system skin flap was elevated to expose the zygomaticus major, zygomaticus minor, levator labii superioris, and levator labii superioris alaeque nasi. Muscle location, length, width, angle of pull, and any anatomic variation were noted. Results All specimens had zygomaticus major, levator labii superioris, and levator labii superioris alaeque nasi muscles present bilaterally. Conversely, the zygomaticus minor was present in only 10 of 19 hemifaces. There was no significant difference in muscle length, width, or line of pull between specimen sides. Of all the assessed muscles, the zygomaticus minor had the most transverse line of pull, at 31.6°; the zygomaticus major was more oblique with a line of pull of 55.5°; and the levator labii superioris and levator labii superioris alaeque nasi were oriented almost vertically with angles of 74.7° and 79.0°, respectively. Conclusions The mimetic muscle vector is quite vertical in comparison to the angle obtained by traditional dynamic smile reconstruction surgeries. A more vertical vector, especially at the upper lip, should be considered in smile reconstruction.
AB - Background The human smile is a complex coordinated activity of mimetic muscles predominantly recognizable by a superolateral pull at the commissure and elevation of the upper lip. The aim of this study was to revisit the muscles of facial expression responsible for these motions, evaluate their relational anatomy and orientation, and relate this to optimal positioning of free muscle transfer in smile reanimation. Methods Nineteen hemifaces from fresh cadaveric specimens were dissected. A subsuperficial muscular aponeurotic system skin flap was elevated to expose the zygomaticus major, zygomaticus minor, levator labii superioris, and levator labii superioris alaeque nasi. Muscle location, length, width, angle of pull, and any anatomic variation were noted. Results All specimens had zygomaticus major, levator labii superioris, and levator labii superioris alaeque nasi muscles present bilaterally. Conversely, the zygomaticus minor was present in only 10 of 19 hemifaces. There was no significant difference in muscle length, width, or line of pull between specimen sides. Of all the assessed muscles, the zygomaticus minor had the most transverse line of pull, at 31.6°; the zygomaticus major was more oblique with a line of pull of 55.5°; and the levator labii superioris and levator labii superioris alaeque nasi were oriented almost vertically with angles of 74.7° and 79.0°, respectively. Conclusions The mimetic muscle vector is quite vertical in comparison to the angle obtained by traditional dynamic smile reconstruction surgeries. A more vertical vector, especially at the upper lip, should be considered in smile reconstruction.
KW - facial reanimation
KW - free muscle transfer
KW - smile anatomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050643872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050643872&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001507
DO - 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001507
M3 - Article
C2 - 29846216
AN - SCOPUS:85050643872
SN - 0148-7043
VL - 81
SP - 203
EP - 207
JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery
JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery
IS - 2
ER -