TY - JOUR
T1 - Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System
T2 - Identifying Barriers, Facilitators, and Strategies for Implementation in Research, Education, and Clinical Care
AU - Van Stan, Jarrad H.
AU - Holmes, Jain
AU - Wengerd, Lauren
AU - Juckett, Lisa A.
AU - Whyte, John
AU - Pinto, Shanti M.
AU - Katz, Leanna W.
AU - Wolfberg, Jeremy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Objective: To explore rehabilitation professionals' experiences and perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) in research, education, and clinical care. Design: A cross-sectional survey with free text and binary responses was completed by rehabilitation professionals. Survey data were analyzed with a deductive approach of directed content analysis using 2 implementation science frameworks: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC). Setting: Rehabilitation professionals across research, educational, and clinical settings. Participants: One hundred and eleven rehabilitation professionals—including speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, physicians, psychologists, researchers, and clinic directors—who explored possible uses or applications of the RTSS for clinical care, education, or research (N=111). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Frequency of reported CFIR barriers and facilitators, as well as keywords related to CFIR and ERIC constructs. Results: The barriers and facilitating strategies differed according to the end-users’ intended use, that is, research, education, or clinical. Overall, the 4 most frequently encountered CFIR barriers were the RTSS's complexity, a lack of available RTSS resources, reduced access to knowledge and information about the RTSS, and limited knowledge and beliefs about the RTSS. The ERIC-CFIR matching tool identified 7 ERIC strategies to address these barriers, which include conducting educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, accessing new funding, capturing and sharing local knowledge, identifying and preparing champions, and promoting adaptability. Conclusions: When attempting to use the RTSS, rehabilitation professionals commonly encountered barriers to understanding and skillfully using the framework. Theory-driven implementation strategies have been identified that have potential for addressing the RTSS's complexity and lack of educational and skill-building resources. Future work can develop the identified implementation strategies and evaluate their effects on RTSS implementation.
AB - Objective: To explore rehabilitation professionals' experiences and perspectives of barriers and facilitators to implementing the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) in research, education, and clinical care. Design: A cross-sectional survey with free text and binary responses was completed by rehabilitation professionals. Survey data were analyzed with a deductive approach of directed content analysis using 2 implementation science frameworks: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC). Setting: Rehabilitation professionals across research, educational, and clinical settings. Participants: One hundred and eleven rehabilitation professionals—including speech-language pathologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, physicians, psychologists, researchers, and clinic directors—who explored possible uses or applications of the RTSS for clinical care, education, or research (N=111). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Frequency of reported CFIR barriers and facilitators, as well as keywords related to CFIR and ERIC constructs. Results: The barriers and facilitating strategies differed according to the end-users’ intended use, that is, research, education, or clinical. Overall, the 4 most frequently encountered CFIR barriers were the RTSS's complexity, a lack of available RTSS resources, reduced access to knowledge and information about the RTSS, and limited knowledge and beliefs about the RTSS. The ERIC-CFIR matching tool identified 7 ERIC strategies to address these barriers, which include conducting educational meetings, developing and distributing educational materials, accessing new funding, capturing and sharing local knowledge, identifying and preparing champions, and promoting adaptability. Conclusions: When attempting to use the RTSS, rehabilitation professionals commonly encountered barriers to understanding and skillfully using the framework. Theory-driven implementation strategies have been identified that have potential for addressing the RTSS's complexity and lack of educational and skill-building resources. Future work can develop the identified implementation strategies and evaluate their effects on RTSS implementation.
KW - Implementation science
KW - Methods
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Therapeutics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85144042761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85144042761&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.021
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.09.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 36306923
AN - SCOPUS:85144042761
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 104
SP - 562
EP - 568
JO - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
JF - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
IS - 4
ER -