Real-world differences in dosing and clinical utilization of OnabotulinumtoxinA and AbobotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of upper limb spasticity

According to prescribing information, potency units are not interchangeable between botulinum toxin A products. This exploratory study compared real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with upper limb spasticity. In this retrospective study, 101 clinicians provided chart data via online surveys for 215 US post-stroke patients treated for upper limb spasticity with ≥3 onabotulinumtoxinA or abobotulinumtoxinA doses (phase 1: 9/18/2020–12/10/2020; phase 2: 9/30/2021–12/7/2021). Most participating clinicians were physicians (70.3%) specializing in neurology (71.3%) or physiatry (20.8%). In the onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 107) and abobotulinumtoxinA (n = 108) groups, ∼75% of patients had moderate-to-severe spasticity. A range of onabotulinumtoxinA:abobotulinumtoxinA dose ratios (1:2.2 [95% CI: 1.8, 2.6] to 1:4.1 [95% CI: 3.0, 6.0]) was observed across muscles. For the most recent dose, mean number of muscles injected was greater for onabotulinumtoxinA (4.3) versus abobotulinumtoxinA (3.1; P = 0.0003). For onabotulinumtoxinA versus abobotulinumtoxinA, the proportion of injections was 81.3% versus 63.9% (P = 0.0067) in forearm muscles and 23.4% versus 3.7% (P = 0.0001) in hand muscles. Mean injection intervals were similar (onabotulinumtoxinA: 102.0 days; abobotulinumtoxinA: 99.1 days). Differences in real-world dosing and utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA and abobotulinumtoxinA for upper limb spasticity were observed. There was no standard dose-conversion ratio, consistent with each product's prescribing information.