TY - JOUR
T1 - Public reporting of patient safety metrics
T2 - Ready or not?
AU - Podolsky, Daniel K.
AU - Nagarkar, Purushottam A.
AU - Reed, W. Gary
AU - Rohrich, Rod J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In its 1999 report, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical error leads to between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths per year. Given that statistic, public reporting of quality and safety metrics is a welcome response that may serve to reduce the rate of adverse events and restore patients' trust in the health care system. To ensure that any public reporting system fulfills its potential, several questions must be addressed: Are we measuring the right metrics? Are the metrics accurate, valid, and is their public reporting effecting change? Based on a review of the literature, it is clear that current metrics suffer from low reliability, low validity, and possibly minimal relevance to the intended consumer. To improve data collection and analysis, both physicians and health care consumers need to be involved in the design and collection of metrics. Until we have a valid, reliable, and actionable data set at our fingertips, it would behoove patients, providers, and institutions to look at outcome and safety metrics with a skeptical and discerning eye.
AB - In its 1999 report, the Institute of Medicine estimated that medical error leads to between 44,000 and 98,000 deaths per year. Given that statistic, public reporting of quality and safety metrics is a welcome response that may serve to reduce the rate of adverse events and restore patients' trust in the health care system. To ensure that any public reporting system fulfills its potential, several questions must be addressed: Are we measuring the right metrics? Are the metrics accurate, valid, and is their public reporting effecting change? Based on a review of the literature, it is clear that current metrics suffer from low reliability, low validity, and possibly minimal relevance to the intended consumer. To improve data collection and analysis, both physicians and health care consumers need to be involved in the design and collection of metrics. Until we have a valid, reliable, and actionable data set at our fingertips, it would behoove patients, providers, and institutions to look at outcome and safety metrics with a skeptical and discerning eye.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922480367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922480367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000713
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000713
M3 - Article
C2 - 25415121
AN - SCOPUS:84922480367
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 134
SP - 981e-985e
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 6
ER -