Abstract
Background: Disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are important in assessing the impact of disease and treatment. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is the first instrument for quantifying pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and impacts developed according to the 2009 US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance; previous qualitative research in patients with PAH supported its initial content validity. Methods: Content finalization and psychometric validation were conducted by using data from A Study of Macitentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension to Validate the PAH-SYMPACT (SYMPHONY), a single-arm, 16-week trial with macitentan 10 mg in US patients with PAH. Item performance, Rasch analysis, and factor analyses were used to select the final item content of the PRO and to define its domain structure. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, known-group and construct validity, sensitivity to change, and influence of oxygen on item performance were evaluated. Results: Data from 278 patients (79% female; mean age: 60 years) were analyzed. Following removal of redundant/misfitting items, the final questionnaire has 11 symptom items across two domains (cardiopulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms) and 11 impact items across two domains (physical and cognitive/emotional impacts). Differential item function analysis confirmed that PRO scoring is unaffected by oxygen use. For all four domains, internal consistency reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80), and scores were highly reproducible in stable patients (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.84-0.94). Correlations with the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review questionnaire and the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey were moderate to high ([r] = 0.34-0.80). The questionnaire differentiated well between patients with varying disease severity levels and was sensitive to improvements in clinician- and patient-reported disease severity. Conclusions: The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is a brief, disease-specific PRO instrument possessing good psychometric properties that can be administered in clinical practice and clinical studies. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01841762; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 848-861 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | CHEST |
Volume | 154 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- macitentan
- patient-reported outcomes
- pulmonary arterial hypertension
- symptoms
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Psychometric Validation of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) Questionnaire: Results of the SYMPHONY Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
Psychometric Validation of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) Questionnaire : Results of the SYMPHONY Trial. / Chin, Kelly M.; Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi; Channick, Richard N. et al.
In: CHEST, Vol. 154, No. 4, 10.2018, p. 848-861.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychometric Validation of the Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact (PAH-SYMPACT) Questionnaire
T2 - Results of the SYMPHONY Trial
AU - Chin, Kelly M.
AU - Gomberg-Maitland, Mardi
AU - Channick, Richard N.
AU - Cuttica, Michael J.
AU - Fischer, Aryeh
AU - Frantz, Robert P.
AU - Hunsche, Elke
AU - Kleinman, Leah
AU - McConnell, John W.
AU - McLaughlin, Vallerie V.
AU - Miller, Chad E.
AU - Zamanian, Roham T.
AU - Zastrow, Michael S.
AU - Badesch, David B.
N1 - Funding Information: Financial/nonfinancial disclosures: The authors have reported to CHEST the following: K. M. C. has received consultant fees from Actelion and United Therapeutics; and has received research support from Actelion, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and the National Institutes of Health. The University of Chicago has received research funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Lung Biotechnology, Medtronic, and Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc for M.G.-M. to participate in clinical trials; M.G.-M has participated as a consultant (steering committees, Data and Safety Monitoring Boards, and/or event committees) for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Arena, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Liquidia, Medtronic, Merck, St. Jude’s Medical Inc, UCB, and United Therapeutics. R. N. C. has received fees/grants from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and United Therapeutics. M. J. C. has received consulting fees and honoraria from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, Gilead, and United Therapeutics. A. F. has received consultant fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, aTyr Pharma, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech-Roche Inc, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. R. P. F. reports steering committee and advisory board participation for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd; steering committee and Data and Safety Monitoring Board participation for United Therapeutics; consulting participation for Bayer Corporation; and has received consulting fees from St. Jude Medical, Inc. E. H. and M. S. Z. were employees of Actelion when this research was conducted and previously had stock options or bond holdings in Actelion. L. K. is a salaried employee of Evidera; Evidera has received payments from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd for services related to the conduct of this research. J. W. M. has received honoraria and acted as a consultant for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and Reata Pharmaceuticals; has advisory board participation for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and United Therapeutics; has speakers bureau participation for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and Genentech; and has received research funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, Bellerophon, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Gilead Pharmaceuticals, Lung Rx, Reata Pharmaceuticals, and United Therapeutics. V. V. M. has received fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, Inc, St. Jude Medical, and United Therapeutics Corporation for advisory board participation and/or consulting; the University of Michigan has received research funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc, Arena, Bayer, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Gilead, Ikaria, and Novartis for V. V. M. to participate in clinical trials. C. E. M. has received fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd for speakers bureau and clinical trial participation. R. T. Z. has received grants from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and United Therapeutics; has received consulting fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and United Therapeutics; and holds shares in Genentech, Inc and Selten Pharma, Inc. D. B. B. has served as a consultant (on steering committees and advisory boards) for Acceleron, Actelion, Arena, Bellerophon, Gilead, Liquidia, and United Therapeutics/Lung LLC; and has received grant support from Actelion, Arena, Bellerophon, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Gilead, Reata, and United Therapeutics/Lung LLC. Funding Information: Author contributions: K. M. C. takes responsibility for the content of this article, including the data and analysis. K. M. C., M. G.-M., R. N. C., A. F., R. P. F., C. E. M., R. T. Z., and D. B. B. participated in study design, data acquisition, and data analysis/interpretation. M. J. C., J. W. M., V. V. M., and M. S. Z. participated in data acquisition, and data analysis/interpretation. E. H. and L. K. conceived of the study and participated in study design and data analysis/interpretation. All authors contributed to manuscript drafting and/or critical revision, approved the final manuscript, and agree to be held accountable for all aspects of the work. Financial/nonfinancial disclosures: The authors have reported to CHEST the following: K. M. C. has received consultant fees from Actelion and United Therapeutics; and has received research support from Actelion, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and the National Institutes of Health. The University of Chicago has received research funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Lung Biotechnology, Medtronic, and Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc for M.G.-M. to participate in clinical trials; M.G.-M has participated as a consultant (steering committees, Data and Safety Monitoring Boards, and/or event committees) for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Arena, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, Inc, Liquidia, Medtronic, Merck, St. Jude's Medical Inc, UCB, and United Therapeutics. R. N. C. has received fees/grants from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and United Therapeutics. M. J. C. has received consulting fees and honoraria from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, Gilead, and United Therapeutics. A. F. has received consultant fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, aTyr Pharma, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech-Roche Inc, and Gilead Sciences, Inc. R. P. F. reports steering committee and advisory board participation for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd; steering committee and Data and Safety Monitoring Board participation for United Therapeutics; consulting participation for Bayer Corporation; and has received consulting fees from St. Jude Medical, Inc. E. H. and M. S. Z. were employees of Actelion when this research was conducted and previously had stock options or bond holdings in Actelion. L. K. is a salaried employee of Evidera; Evidera has received payments from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd for services related to the conduct of this research. J. W. M. has received honoraria and acted as a consultant for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and Reata Pharmaceuticals; has advisory board participation for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and United Therapeutics; has speakers bureau participation for Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and Genentech; and has received research funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, Bellerophon, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Gilead Pharmaceuticals, Lung Rx, Reata Pharmaceuticals, and United Therapeutics. V. V. M. has received fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, Inc, St. Jude Medical, and United Therapeutics Corporation for advisory board participation and/or consulting; the University of Michigan has received research funding from Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc, Arena, Bayer, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Gilead, Ikaria, and Novartis for V. V. M. to participate in clinical trials. C. E. M. has received fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd for speakers bureau and clinical trial participation. R. T. Z. has received grants from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Reata Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and United Therapeutics; has received consulting fees from Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Bayer, and United Therapeutics; and holds shares in Genentech, Inc and Selten Pharma, Inc. D. B. B. has served as a consultant (on steering committees and advisory boards) for Acceleron, Actelion, Arena, Bellerophon, Gilead, Liquidia, and United Therapeutics/Lung LLC; and has received grant support from Actelion, Arena, Bellerophon, Eiger BioPharmaceuticals, Gilead, Reata, and United Therapeutics/Lung LLC. Role of sponsor: The PAH-SYMPACT is copyright protected and owned by the sponsor, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd provided the study design and statistical analysis plan, and participated in data analysis and interpretation, preparation of the manuscript, and the decision to publish the manuscript. The psychometric study was conducted by Evidera, funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Medical writing and editorial support were provided by W. Mark Roberts, PhD, Montreal, QC, Canada, funded by Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Other contributions: The SYMPHONY investigators are listed in e-Table 8. Additional information: The e-Tables can be found in the Supplemental Materials section of the online article. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Authors
PY - 2018/10
Y1 - 2018/10
N2 - Background: Disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are important in assessing the impact of disease and treatment. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is the first instrument for quantifying pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and impacts developed according to the 2009 US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance; previous qualitative research in patients with PAH supported its initial content validity. Methods: Content finalization and psychometric validation were conducted by using data from A Study of Macitentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension to Validate the PAH-SYMPACT (SYMPHONY), a single-arm, 16-week trial with macitentan 10 mg in US patients with PAH. Item performance, Rasch analysis, and factor analyses were used to select the final item content of the PRO and to define its domain structure. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, known-group and construct validity, sensitivity to change, and influence of oxygen on item performance were evaluated. Results: Data from 278 patients (79% female; mean age: 60 years) were analyzed. Following removal of redundant/misfitting items, the final questionnaire has 11 symptom items across two domains (cardiopulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms) and 11 impact items across two domains (physical and cognitive/emotional impacts). Differential item function analysis confirmed that PRO scoring is unaffected by oxygen use. For all four domains, internal consistency reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80), and scores were highly reproducible in stable patients (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.84-0.94). Correlations with the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review questionnaire and the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey were moderate to high ([r] = 0.34-0.80). The questionnaire differentiated well between patients with varying disease severity levels and was sensitive to improvements in clinician- and patient-reported disease severity. Conclusions: The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is a brief, disease-specific PRO instrument possessing good psychometric properties that can be administered in clinical practice and clinical studies. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01841762; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
AB - Background: Disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments are important in assessing the impact of disease and treatment. The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is the first instrument for quantifying pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and impacts developed according to the 2009 US Food and Drug Administration PRO guidance; previous qualitative research in patients with PAH supported its initial content validity. Methods: Content finalization and psychometric validation were conducted by using data from A Study of Macitentan in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension to Validate the PAH-SYMPACT (SYMPHONY), a single-arm, 16-week trial with macitentan 10 mg in US patients with PAH. Item performance, Rasch analysis, and factor analyses were used to select the final item content of the PRO and to define its domain structure. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, known-group and construct validity, sensitivity to change, and influence of oxygen on item performance were evaluated. Results: Data from 278 patients (79% female; mean age: 60 years) were analyzed. Following removal of redundant/misfitting items, the final questionnaire has 11 symptom items across two domains (cardiopulmonary and cardiovascular symptoms) and 11 impact items across two domains (physical and cognitive/emotional impacts). Differential item function analysis confirmed that PRO scoring is unaffected by oxygen use. For all four domains, internal consistency reliability was high (Cronbach's alpha > 0.80), and scores were highly reproducible in stable patients (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.84-0.94). Correlations with the Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review questionnaire and the 36-item Medical Outcomes Study Short Form Survey were moderate to high ([r] = 0.34-0.80). The questionnaire differentiated well between patients with varying disease severity levels and was sensitive to improvements in clinician- and patient-reported disease severity. Conclusions: The Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Symptoms and Impact Questionnaire is a brief, disease-specific PRO instrument possessing good psychometric properties that can be administered in clinical practice and clinical studies. Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT01841762; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.
KW - macitentan
KW - patient-reported outcomes
KW - pulmonary arterial hypertension
KW - symptoms
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049092947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049092947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.027
DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2018.04.027
M3 - Article
C2 - 29705220
AN - SCOPUS:85049092947
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 154
SP - 848
EP - 861
JO - Diseases of the chest
JF - Diseases of the chest
IS - 4
ER -