TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary-Care Weight-Management Strategies
T2 - Parental Priorities and Preferences
AU - Turer, Christy Boling
AU - Upperman, Carla
AU - Merchant, Zahra
AU - Montaño, Sergio
AU - Flores, Glenn
N1 - Funding Information:
Presented in part as a poster presentation at the annual meeting of the Obesity Society on November 6, 2014, in Boston, Mass. Supported in part by award K23HL118152-01A1 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI; to Dr Turer) and the UT Southwestern Summer Medical Student Research Program (to Ms Upperman). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the official views of NHLBI or National Institutes of Health.
Funding Information:
Presented in part as a poster presentation at the annual meeting of the Obesity Society on November 6, 2014, in Boston, Mass. Supported in part by award K23HL118152-01A1 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI; to Dr Turer) and the UT Southwestern Summer Medical Student Research Program (to Ms Upperman). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the official views of NHLBI or National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Academic Pediatric Association.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Objective To examine parental perspectives/rankings of the most important weight-management clinical practices and to determine whether preferences/rankings differ when parents disagree that their child is overweight. Methods We performed mixed-methods analysis of a 32-question survey of parents of 2- to 18-year-old overweight children assessing parental agreement that their child is overweight, the single most important thing providers can do to improve weight status, ranking American Academy of Pediatrics-recommended clinical practices, and preferred follow-up interval. Four independent reviewers analyzed open-response data to identify qualitative themes/subthemes. Multivariable analyses examined parental rankings, preferred follow-up interval, and differences by agreement with their child's overweight assessment. Results Thirty-six percent of 219 children were overweight, 42% obese, and 22% severely obese; 16% of parents disagreed with their child's overweight assessment. Qualitative analysis of the most important practice to help overweight children yielded 10 themes; unique to parents disagreeing with their children's overweight assessments was "change weight-status assessments." After adjustment, the 3 highest-ranked clinical practices included, "check for weight-related problems," "review growth chart," and "recommend general dietary changes" (all P <.01); parents disagreeing with their children's overweight assessments ranked "review growth chart" as less important and ranked "reducing screen time" and "general activity changes" as more important. The mean preferred weight-management follow-up interval (10-12 weeks) did not differ by agreement with children's overweight assessments. Conclusions Parents prefer weight-management strategies that prioritize evaluating weight-related problems, growth-chart review, and regular follow-up. Parents who disagree that their child is overweight want changes in how overweight is assessed. Using parent-preferred weight-management strategies may prove useful in improving child weight status.
AB - Objective To examine parental perspectives/rankings of the most important weight-management clinical practices and to determine whether preferences/rankings differ when parents disagree that their child is overweight. Methods We performed mixed-methods analysis of a 32-question survey of parents of 2- to 18-year-old overweight children assessing parental agreement that their child is overweight, the single most important thing providers can do to improve weight status, ranking American Academy of Pediatrics-recommended clinical practices, and preferred follow-up interval. Four independent reviewers analyzed open-response data to identify qualitative themes/subthemes. Multivariable analyses examined parental rankings, preferred follow-up interval, and differences by agreement with their child's overweight assessment. Results Thirty-six percent of 219 children were overweight, 42% obese, and 22% severely obese; 16% of parents disagreed with their child's overweight assessment. Qualitative analysis of the most important practice to help overweight children yielded 10 themes; unique to parents disagreeing with their children's overweight assessments was "change weight-status assessments." After adjustment, the 3 highest-ranked clinical practices included, "check for weight-related problems," "review growth chart," and "recommend general dietary changes" (all P <.01); parents disagreeing with their children's overweight assessments ranked "review growth chart" as less important and ranked "reducing screen time" and "general activity changes" as more important. The mean preferred weight-management follow-up interval (10-12 weeks) did not differ by agreement with children's overweight assessments. Conclusions Parents prefer weight-management strategies that prioritize evaluating weight-related problems, growth-chart review, and regular follow-up. Parents who disagree that their child is overweight want changes in how overweight is assessed. Using parent-preferred weight-management strategies may prove useful in improving child weight status.
KW - childhood obesity
KW - parents
KW - primary care
KW - weight management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949954012&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84949954012&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acap.2015.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.acap.2015.09.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 26514648
AN - SCOPUS:84949954012
SN - 1876-2859
VL - 16
SP - 260
EP - 266
JO - Academic Pediatrics
JF - Academic Pediatrics
IS - 3
ER -