TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary care provider beliefs and recommendations about colorectal cancer screening in four healthcare systems
AU - Ghai, Nirupa R.
AU - Jensen, Christopher D.
AU - Merchant, Sophie A.
AU - Schottinger, Joanne E.
AU - Lee, Jeffrey K.
AU - Chubak, Jessica
AU - Kamineni, Aruna
AU - Halm, Ethan A.
AU - Skinner, Celette Sugg
AU - Haas, Jennifer S.
AU - Green, Beverly B.
AU - Cannizzaro, Nancy T.
AU - Schneider, Jennifer L.
AU - Corley, Douglas A.
N1 - Funding Information:
C.D. Jensen reports grants from NCI during the conduct of the study. S.A. Merchant reports grants from NCI during the conduct of the study. J.E. Schottinger reports grants from NIH (grant PROSPR) during the conduct of the study. J. Chubak reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study and Amgen (evaluating the accuracy of using electronic health record data to identify individuals with reduced ejection fraction heart failure) outside the submitted work. C.S. Skinner reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study. J.S. Haas reports grants from NCI during the conduct of the study. B.B. Green reports grants from NCI during the conduct of the study. D.A. Corley reports grants from NCI during the conduct of the study, as well as Pfizer (for FDA required pharmacoepidemiology project) and Medial Research (for artificial intelligence project for prediction of certain GI diseases) outside the submitted work. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Primary care provider’s (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers’ perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidence suggesting comparable test effectiveness and guideline recommendations for screening frequency. Providers (n ¼ 1,281) within four healthcare systems completed a survey in 2017–2018 regarding their perceptions of test effectiveness and recommended intervals for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for patients ages 40–49, 50–74, and ≥75 years. For patients 50–74 (screening eligible), 82.9% of providers rated colonoscopy as very effective versus 59.6% for FIT, and 26.3% rated colonoscopy as more effective than FIT. Also, for this age group, 77.9% recommended colonoscopy every 10 years and 92.4% recommended FIT annually. For patients ages 40–49 and ≥75, more than one-third of providers believed the tests were somewhat or very effective, although >80% did not routinely recommend screening by either test for these age groups. Provider screening test interval recommendations generally aligned with colorectal cancer guidelines; however, 25% of providers believed colonoscopy was more effective than FIT for mortality reduction, which differs from some modeling studies that suggest comparable effectiveness. The latter finding may have implications for health systems where FIT is the dominant screening strategy. Only one-third of providers reported believing these screening tests were effective in younger and older patients (i.e., <50 and ≥75 years). Evidence addressing these beliefs may be relevant if cancer screening recommendations are modified to include older and/or younger patients.
AB - Primary care provider’s (PCP) perceptions of colorectal cancer screening test effectiveness and their recommendations for testing intervals influence patient screening uptake. Few large studies have examined providers’ perceptions and recommendations, including their alignment with evidence suggesting comparable test effectiveness and guideline recommendations for screening frequency. Providers (n ¼ 1,281) within four healthcare systems completed a survey in 2017–2018 regarding their perceptions of test effectiveness and recommended intervals for colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) for patients ages 40–49, 50–74, and ≥75 years. For patients 50–74 (screening eligible), 82.9% of providers rated colonoscopy as very effective versus 59.6% for FIT, and 26.3% rated colonoscopy as more effective than FIT. Also, for this age group, 77.9% recommended colonoscopy every 10 years and 92.4% recommended FIT annually. For patients ages 40–49 and ≥75, more than one-third of providers believed the tests were somewhat or very effective, although >80% did not routinely recommend screening by either test for these age groups. Provider screening test interval recommendations generally aligned with colorectal cancer guidelines; however, 25% of providers believed colonoscopy was more effective than FIT for mortality reduction, which differs from some modeling studies that suggest comparable effectiveness. The latter finding may have implications for health systems where FIT is the dominant screening strategy. Only one-third of providers reported believing these screening tests were effective in younger and older patients (i.e., <50 and ≥75 years). Evidence addressing these beliefs may be relevant if cancer screening recommendations are modified to include older and/or younger patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100503626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100503626&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109
DO - 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0109
M3 - Article
C2 - 32669318
AN - SCOPUS:85100503626
SN - 1940-6207
VL - 13
SP - 947
EP - 958
JO - Cancer Prevention Research
JF - Cancer Prevention Research
IS - 11
ER -