Practical outcome measures for assessing efficacy of incontinence procedures.

A. G. Baseman, G. E. Lemack

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review


Standard treatment for urinary incontinence in women has evolved during the past few decades. Conservative measures such as pelvic floor exercises and biofeedback may be effective and have been advocated for the past several years. However, the availability of other methods that are potentially more invasive yet efficacious provides a wider range of choices for women with urinary incontinence. With these alternatives comes opportunity and responsibility to assess how successful these treatments are. This article explores current methods of analyzing outcomes of urinary incontinence treatments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-412
Number of pages6
JournalCurrent urology reports
Issue number5
StatePublished - Oct 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Practical outcome measures for assessing efficacy of incontinence procedures.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this