TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-polypectomy Guideline Adherence
T2 - Importance of Belief in Guidelines, Not Guideline Knowledge or Fear of Missed Cancer
AU - Patel, Neha
AU - Tong, Liyue
AU - Ahn, Chul
AU - Singal, Amit G.
AU - Gupta, Samir
N1 - Funding Information:
The project described was supported in part by Merit Review Award number 1 I01 HX001574-01A1 (Gupta, PI) from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development. The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Support was also provided in part by the NCI-funded consortium Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regiments (PROSPR) through NIH/NCI Grant U54CA163308-01 (Singal, CO-I). We thank Drs. Kenneth R. McQuaid, Robert H. Lee, and John E. Pandolfino for reviewing and providing feedback on the physician survey.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York (Outside the USA).
PY - 2015/10/25
Y1 - 2015/10/25
N2 - Background: Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guideline recommendations is suboptimal. Surveillance is frequently over- and under-recommend, resulting in strained colonoscopy capacity, potential risks without expected benefits, and missed opportunities for colorectal cancer risk reduction. Aims: To identify factors associated with adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines. Methods: We conducted a three-phase study with a retrospective review of usual care post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations through medical chart abstraction (Phase I), prospective online physician survey (Phase II), and analysis of survey-based and other physician-based predictors of usual care surveillance recommendations (Phase III). Subjects included patients who underwent usual care colonoscopy 2011–2012 (Phases I and III) and gastroenterology (GI) attendings and fellows (Phases II and III). We identified rates of recommendations consistent with guideline adherence, surveillance overuse, and surveillance underuse based on usual care medical chart documentation and physician survey, as well as predictors of physician adherence to guidelines. Results: We reviewed 640 patient charts for 28 survey respondents. Rates of usual practice recommendations consistent with guideline adherence, surveillance overutilization, and underutilization were 84, 13, and 3 %, respectively. At survey, 82 % of physicians were concerned about missed cancer. Eleven percentage believed that guidelines were not aggressive enough. GI trainees were 2.5 times more likely to issue guideline-adherent recommendations [OR 2.5, 95 % CI (1.5–4.2)]. Disagreement with guideline aggressiveness was independently associated with 40 % lower likelihood of adherence [OR 0.6, 95 % CI (0.4–0.8)]. Conclusions: Belief in the appropriate aggressiveness of guidelines and trainee position, but not fear of missed cancer or guideline knowledge, was associated with adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
AB - Background: Adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guideline recommendations is suboptimal. Surveillance is frequently over- and under-recommend, resulting in strained colonoscopy capacity, potential risks without expected benefits, and missed opportunities for colorectal cancer risk reduction. Aims: To identify factors associated with adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines. Methods: We conducted a three-phase study with a retrospective review of usual care post-polypectomy surveillance recommendations through medical chart abstraction (Phase I), prospective online physician survey (Phase II), and analysis of survey-based and other physician-based predictors of usual care surveillance recommendations (Phase III). Subjects included patients who underwent usual care colonoscopy 2011–2012 (Phases I and III) and gastroenterology (GI) attendings and fellows (Phases II and III). We identified rates of recommendations consistent with guideline adherence, surveillance overuse, and surveillance underuse based on usual care medical chart documentation and physician survey, as well as predictors of physician adherence to guidelines. Results: We reviewed 640 patient charts for 28 survey respondents. Rates of usual practice recommendations consistent with guideline adherence, surveillance overutilization, and underutilization were 84, 13, and 3 %, respectively. At survey, 82 % of physicians were concerned about missed cancer. Eleven percentage believed that guidelines were not aggressive enough. GI trainees were 2.5 times more likely to issue guideline-adherent recommendations [OR 2.5, 95 % CI (1.5–4.2)]. Disagreement with guideline aggressiveness was independently associated with 40 % lower likelihood of adherence [OR 0.6, 95 % CI (0.4–0.8)]. Conclusions: Belief in the appropriate aggressiveness of guidelines and trainee position, but not fear of missed cancer or guideline knowledge, was associated with adherence to post-polypectomy surveillance guidelines.
KW - Guideline adherence
KW - Polypectomy
KW - Practice patterns
KW - Recommendations
KW - Surveillance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942194655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942194655&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x
DO - 10.1007/s10620-015-3685-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 25947332
AN - SCOPUS:84942194655
SN - 0163-2116
VL - 60
SP - 2937
EP - 2945
JO - Digestive Diseases and Sciences
JF - Digestive Diseases and Sciences
IS - 10
ER -