TY - JOUR
T1 - Physiological dead space during exercise in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
AU - Balmain, Bryce N.
AU - Tomlinson, Andrew R.
AU - MacNamara, James P.
AU - Sarma, Satyam
AU - Levine, Benjamin D.
AU - Hynan, Linda S.
AU - Babb, Tony G.
N1 - Funding Information:
B. N. Balmain is supported by an American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship. This research was also supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant 1P01HL137630 and Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Dallas.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 the American Physiological Society..
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with cardiopulmonary abnormalities that may increase physiological dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) during exercise. However, studies have not corrected VD/VT for apparatus mechanical dead space (VDM), which may confound the accurate calculation of VD/VT. We evaluated whether calculating physiological dead space with (VD/VTVDM) and without (VD/VT) correcting for VDM impacts the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency during exercise in HFpEF. Fifteen HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 yr; V_ O2peak: 1.34 ± 0.45 L/min) and 12 controls (70 ± 3 yr; V_ O2peak: 1.70 ± 0.51 L/ min) were studied. Pulmonary gas exchange and arterial blood gases were analyzed at rest, submaximal (20 W for HFpEF and 40 W for controls), and peak exercise. VD/VT was calculated as PaCO 2 – PECO2 /PaCO 2 . VD/VTVDM was calculated as PaCO 2 – PECO2 /PaCO 2 –VDM/VT. VD/VT decreased from rest (HFpEF: 0.54 ± 0.07; controls: 0.32 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.07; controls: 0.25 ± 0.06) in both groups (P < 0.05), but remained stable (P > 0.05) thereafter to peak exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.09; controls: 0.22 ± 0.05). In HFpEF, VD/VTVDM did not change (P = 0.58) from rest (0.29 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (0.29 ± 0.06), but increased (P = 0.02) thereafter to peak exercise (0.33 ± 0.06). In controls, VD/VTVDM remained stable such that no change was observed (P > 0.05) from rest (0.17 ± 0.06) to submaximal exercise (0.14 ± 0.06), or thereafter to peak exercise (0.14 ± 0.05). Calculating physiological dead space with and without a VDM correction yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have impact on the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency in HFpEF. Further investigation is required to uncover the clinical consequences and the mechanism(s) explaining the increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise in HFpEF. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Calculating VD/VT with and without correcting for VDM yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have an important impact on the interpretation of V/Q mismatch in HFpEF. The finding that V/Q mismatch and gas exchange efficiency worsened, as reflected by an increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise, has not been previously demonstrated in HFpEF. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms explaining the increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise in patients with HFpEF.
AB - Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with cardiopulmonary abnormalities that may increase physiological dead space to tidal volume (VD/VT) during exercise. However, studies have not corrected VD/VT for apparatus mechanical dead space (VDM), which may confound the accurate calculation of VD/VT. We evaluated whether calculating physiological dead space with (VD/VTVDM) and without (VD/VT) correcting for VDM impacts the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency during exercise in HFpEF. Fifteen HFpEF (age: 69 ± 6 yr; V_ O2peak: 1.34 ± 0.45 L/min) and 12 controls (70 ± 3 yr; V_ O2peak: 1.70 ± 0.51 L/ min) were studied. Pulmonary gas exchange and arterial blood gases were analyzed at rest, submaximal (20 W for HFpEF and 40 W for controls), and peak exercise. VD/VT was calculated as PaCO 2 – PECO2 /PaCO 2 . VD/VTVDM was calculated as PaCO 2 – PECO2 /PaCO 2 –VDM/VT. VD/VT decreased from rest (HFpEF: 0.54 ± 0.07; controls: 0.32 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.07; controls: 0.25 ± 0.06) in both groups (P < 0.05), but remained stable (P > 0.05) thereafter to peak exercise (HFpEF: 0.46 ± 0.09; controls: 0.22 ± 0.05). In HFpEF, VD/VTVDM did not change (P = 0.58) from rest (0.29 ± 0.07) to submaximal exercise (0.29 ± 0.06), but increased (P = 0.02) thereafter to peak exercise (0.33 ± 0.06). In controls, VD/VTVDM remained stable such that no change was observed (P > 0.05) from rest (0.17 ± 0.06) to submaximal exercise (0.14 ± 0.06), or thereafter to peak exercise (0.14 ± 0.05). Calculating physiological dead space with and without a VDM correction yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have impact on the interpretation of gas exchange efficiency in HFpEF. Further investigation is required to uncover the clinical consequences and the mechanism(s) explaining the increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise in HFpEF. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Calculating VD/VT with and without correcting for VDM yields quantitively and qualitatively different results, which could have an important impact on the interpretation of V/Q mismatch in HFpEF. The finding that V/Q mismatch and gas exchange efficiency worsened, as reflected by an increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise, has not been previously demonstrated in HFpEF. Thus, further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms explaining the increase in VD/VTVDM during exercise in patients with HFpEF.
KW - HFpEF
KW - dead space
KW - exercise
KW - gas exchange inefficiency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85125554686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85125554686&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00786.2021
DO - 10.1152/japplphysiol.00786.2021
M3 - Article
C2 - 35112932
AN - SCOPUS:85125554686
SN - 0161-7567
VL - 132
SP - 632
EP - 640
JO - Journal of Applied Physiology
JF - Journal of Applied Physiology
IS - 3
ER -