TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase 2 Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Patients with Primary Renal Cancer
AU - Hannan, Raquibul
AU - McLaughlin, Mark F.
AU - Pop, Laurentiu M.
AU - Pedrosa, Ivan
AU - Kapur, Payal
AU - Garant, Aurelie
AU - Ahn, Chul
AU - Christie, Alana
AU - Zhu, James
AU - Wang, Tao
AU - Robles, Liliana
AU - Durakoglugil, Deniz
AU - Woldu, Solomon
AU - Margulis, Vitaly
AU - Gahan, Jeffrey
AU - Brugarolas, James
AU - Timmerman, Robert
AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 European Association of Urology
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Background: Most renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are localized and managed by active surveillance, surgery, or minimally invasive techniques. Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) may provide an innovative non-invasive alternative although prospective data are limited. Objective: To investigate whether SAbR is effective in the management of primary RCCs. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with biopsy-confirmed radiographically enlarging primary RCC (≤5 cm) were enrolled. SAbR was delivered in either three (12 Gy) or five (8 Gy) fractions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was local control (LC) defined as a reduction in tumor growth rate (compared with a benchmark of 4 mm/yr on active surveillance) and pathologic evidence of tumor response at 1 yr. Secondary endpoints included LC by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), safety, and preservation of kidney function. Exploratory tumor cell–enriched spatial protein and gene expression analysis were conducted on pre- and post-treatment biopsy samples. Results and limitations: Target accrual was reached with the enrollment of 16 ethnically diverse patients. Radiographic LC at 1 yr was observed in 94% of patients (15/16; 95% confidence interval: 70, 100), and this was accompanied by pathologic evidence of tumor response (hyalinization, necrosis, and reduced tumor cellularity) in all patients. By RECIST, 100% of the sites remained without progression at 1 yr. The median pretreatment growth rate was 0.8 cm/yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.3, 1.4), and the median post-treatment growth rate was 0.0 cm/yr (IQR: –0.4, 0.1, p < 0.002). Tumor cell viability decreased from 4.6% to 0.7% at 1 yr (p = 0.004). With a median follow-up of 36 mo for censored patients, the disease control rate was 94%. SAbR was well tolerated with no grade ≥2 (acute or late) toxicities. The average glomerular filtration rate declined from a baseline of 65.6 to 55.4 ml/min at 1 yr (p = 0.003). Spatial protein and gene expression analyses were consistent with the induction of cellular senescence by radiation. Conclusions: This clinical trial adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that SAbR is effective for primary RCC supporting its evaluation in comparative phase 3 clinical trials. Patient summary: In this clinical trial, we investigated a noninvasive treatment option of stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of primary kidney cancer and found that it was safe and effective.
AB - Background: Most renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are localized and managed by active surveillance, surgery, or minimally invasive techniques. Stereotactic ablative radiation (SAbR) may provide an innovative non-invasive alternative although prospective data are limited. Objective: To investigate whether SAbR is effective in the management of primary RCCs. Design, setting, and participants: Patients with biopsy-confirmed radiographically enlarging primary RCC (≤5 cm) were enrolled. SAbR was delivered in either three (12 Gy) or five (8 Gy) fractions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was local control (LC) defined as a reduction in tumor growth rate (compared with a benchmark of 4 mm/yr on active surveillance) and pathologic evidence of tumor response at 1 yr. Secondary endpoints included LC by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1), safety, and preservation of kidney function. Exploratory tumor cell–enriched spatial protein and gene expression analysis were conducted on pre- and post-treatment biopsy samples. Results and limitations: Target accrual was reached with the enrollment of 16 ethnically diverse patients. Radiographic LC at 1 yr was observed in 94% of patients (15/16; 95% confidence interval: 70, 100), and this was accompanied by pathologic evidence of tumor response (hyalinization, necrosis, and reduced tumor cellularity) in all patients. By RECIST, 100% of the sites remained without progression at 1 yr. The median pretreatment growth rate was 0.8 cm/yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.3, 1.4), and the median post-treatment growth rate was 0.0 cm/yr (IQR: –0.4, 0.1, p < 0.002). Tumor cell viability decreased from 4.6% to 0.7% at 1 yr (p = 0.004). With a median follow-up of 36 mo for censored patients, the disease control rate was 94%. SAbR was well tolerated with no grade ≥2 (acute or late) toxicities. The average glomerular filtration rate declined from a baseline of 65.6 to 55.4 ml/min at 1 yr (p = 0.003). Spatial protein and gene expression analyses were consistent with the induction of cellular senescence by radiation. Conclusions: This clinical trial adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that SAbR is effective for primary RCC supporting its evaluation in comparative phase 3 clinical trials. Patient summary: In this clinical trial, we investigated a noninvasive treatment option of stereotactic radiation therapy for the treatment of primary kidney cancer and found that it was safe and effective.
KW - Primary renal cell carcinoma
KW - Renal cell carcinoma
KW - Senescence
KW - Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85149769422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85149769422&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.016
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 36898872
AN - SCOPUS:85149769422
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 84
SP - 275
EP - 286
JO - European urology
JF - European urology
IS - 3
ER -