TY - JOUR
T1 - Peripheral biomarkers of major depression and antidepressant treatment response
T2 - Current knowledge and future outlooks
AU - Gadad, Bharathi S.
AU - Jha, Manish K.
AU - Czysz, Andrew
AU - Furman, Jennifer L.
AU - Mayes, Taryn L.
AU - Emslie, Michael P.
AU - Trivedi, Madhukar H.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by the Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care (to MHT) and by the NIMH under Award Number R25MH101078 (to AC). NIMH had no role in the drafting or review of the manuscript or in the collection or analysis of the data.
Funding Information:
BSG, MKJ, AC, TLM, and MPE report no financial disclosures. JLF has received research funding from the NIA and licensing fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, C2N Diagnostics, Treventis Corp., Denali Therapeutics, and ADRx Inc. MHT has received funding support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Cyberonics Inc., National Alliance for Research in Schizophrenia and Depression, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), Johnson & Johnson. He has received advisor/consultant fees from Abbott Laboratories Inc., Akzo (Organon Pharmaceuticals Inc.), Allergan Sales LLC, Alkermes, Arcadia Pharmaceuticals Inc., AstraZeneca, Axon Advisors, Brintellix, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cephalon Inc., Cerecor, Eli Lilly & Company, Evotec, Fabre Kramer Pharmaceuticals Inc., Forest Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmit hKl ine, Global Medical Education Inc., Health Research Associates, Johnson & Johnson, Lundbeck, MedAvante, Medscape, Medtronic, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Development America Inc., MSI Methylation Sciences Inc., Nestle Health Science-PamLab Inc., Naurex, Neuronetics, One Carbon Therapeutics Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceuticals, Pamlab, Parke-Davis Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pfizer Inc., PgxHealth, Phoenix Marketing Solutions, Rexahn Pharmaceuticals, Ridge Diagnostics, Roche Products Ltd., Sepracor, SHIRE Development, Sierra, SK Life and Science, Sunovion, Takeda, Tal Medical/Puretech Venture, Targacept, Transcept, VantagePoint, Vivus, and Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories.
Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by the Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care (to MHT) and by the NIMH under Award Number R25MH101078 (to AC).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Background: In recent years, we have accomplished a deeper understanding about the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). Nevertheless, this improved comprehension has not translated to improved treatment outcome, as identification of specific biologic markers of disease may still be crucial to facilitate a more rapid, successful treatment. Ongoing research explores the importance of screening biomarkers using neuroimaging, neurophysiology, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics measures. Results: In the present review, we highlight the biomarkers that are differentially expressed in MDD and treatment response and place a particular emphasis on the most recent progress in advancing technology which will continue the search for blood-based biomarkers. Limitations: Due to space constraints, we are unable to detail all biomarker platforms, such as neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers, although their contributions are certainly applicable to a biomarker review and valuable to the field. Conclusions: Although the search for reliable biomarkers of depression and/or treatment outcome is ongoing, the rapidly-expanding field of research along with promising new technologies may provide the foundation for identifying key factors which will ultimately help direct patients toward a quicker and more effective treatment for MDD.
AB - Background: In recent years, we have accomplished a deeper understanding about the pathophysiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). Nevertheless, this improved comprehension has not translated to improved treatment outcome, as identification of specific biologic markers of disease may still be crucial to facilitate a more rapid, successful treatment. Ongoing research explores the importance of screening biomarkers using neuroimaging, neurophysiology, genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics measures. Results: In the present review, we highlight the biomarkers that are differentially expressed in MDD and treatment response and place a particular emphasis on the most recent progress in advancing technology which will continue the search for blood-based biomarkers. Limitations: Due to space constraints, we are unable to detail all biomarker platforms, such as neurophysiological and neuroimaging markers, although their contributions are certainly applicable to a biomarker review and valuable to the field. Conclusions: Although the search for reliable biomarkers of depression and/or treatment outcome is ongoing, the rapidly-expanding field of research along with promising new technologies may provide the foundation for identifying key factors which will ultimately help direct patients toward a quicker and more effective treatment for MDD.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Biosignatures
KW - Depression
KW - Genomics
KW - Metabolomics
KW - Proteomics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023199388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023199388&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.001
DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.001
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28709695
AN - SCOPUS:85023199388
SN - 0165-0327
VL - 233
SP - 3
EP - 14
JO - Journal of Affective Disorders
JF - Journal of Affective Disorders
ER -