TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing scoring and sampling methods for assessing built neighborhood environment quality in residential areas
AU - Adu-Brimpong, Joel
AU - Coffey, Nathan
AU - Ayers, Colby
AU - Berrigan, David
AU - Yingling, Leah R.
AU - Thomas, Samantha
AU - Mitchell, Valerie
AU - Ahuja, Chaarushi
AU - Rivers, Joshua
AU - Hartz, Jacob
AU - Powell-Wiley, Tiffany M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to acknowledge our study participants, members of DC Cardiovascular Health and Obesity Collaborative and our DC faith-based community partners for helping to make this research possible. We would also like to acknowledge all funding sources. The Powell–Wiley research group is funded by the Division of Intramural Research of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health. David Berrigan is funded by the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health Undergraduate Scholarship Program via funding for Joel Adu-Brimpong and Samantha Thomas. The views expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; the National Institutes of Health; or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2017/3/8
Y1 - 2017/3/8
N2 - Optimization of existing measurement tools is necessary to explore links between aspects of the neighborhood built environment and health behaviors or outcomes. We evaluate a scoring method for virtual neighborhood audits utilizing the Active Neighborhood Checklist (the Checklist), a neighborhood audit measure, and assess street segment representativeness in low-income neighborhoods. Eighty-two home neighborhoods of Washington, D.C. Cardiovascular Health/Needs Assessment (NCT01927783) participants were audited using Google Street View imagery and the Checklist (five sections with 89 total questions). Twelve street segments per home address were assessed for (1) Land-Use Type; (2) Public Transportation Availability; (3) Street Characteristics; (4) Environment Quality and (5) Sidewalks/Walking/Biking features. Checklist items were scored 0–2 points/question. A combinations algorithm was developed to assess street segments’ representativeness. Spearman correlations were calculated between built environment quality scores and Walk Score®, a validated neighborhood walkability measure. Street segment quality scores ranged 10–47 (Mean = 29.4 ± 6.9) and overall neighborhood quality scores, 172–475 (Mean = 352.3 ± 63.6). Walk scores® ranged 0–91 (Mean = 46.7 ± 26.3). Street segment combinations’ correlation coefficients ranged 0.75–1.0. Significant positive correlations were found between overall neighborhood quality scores, four of the five Checklist subsection scores, and Walk Scores® (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). This scoring method adequately captures neighborhood features in low-income, residential areas and may aid in delineating impact of specific built environment features on health behaviors and outcomes.
AB - Optimization of existing measurement tools is necessary to explore links between aspects of the neighborhood built environment and health behaviors or outcomes. We evaluate a scoring method for virtual neighborhood audits utilizing the Active Neighborhood Checklist (the Checklist), a neighborhood audit measure, and assess street segment representativeness in low-income neighborhoods. Eighty-two home neighborhoods of Washington, D.C. Cardiovascular Health/Needs Assessment (NCT01927783) participants were audited using Google Street View imagery and the Checklist (five sections with 89 total questions). Twelve street segments per home address were assessed for (1) Land-Use Type; (2) Public Transportation Availability; (3) Street Characteristics; (4) Environment Quality and (5) Sidewalks/Walking/Biking features. Checklist items were scored 0–2 points/question. A combinations algorithm was developed to assess street segments’ representativeness. Spearman correlations were calculated between built environment quality scores and Walk Score®, a validated neighborhood walkability measure. Street segment quality scores ranged 10–47 (Mean = 29.4 ± 6.9) and overall neighborhood quality scores, 172–475 (Mean = 352.3 ± 63.6). Walk scores® ranged 0–91 (Mean = 46.7 ± 26.3). Street segment combinations’ correlation coefficients ranged 0.75–1.0. Significant positive correlations were found between overall neighborhood quality scores, four of the five Checklist subsection scores, and Walk Scores® (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). This scoring method adequately captures neighborhood features in low-income, residential areas and may aid in delineating impact of specific built environment features on health behaviors and outcomes.
KW - Active Neighborhood Checklist
KW - Built neighborhood environment
KW - Environment quality
KW - Google Street View
KW - Residential neighborhoods
KW - Virtual audits
KW - Walk Score®
KW - Washington D.C. Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014809393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014809393&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph14030273
DO - 10.3390/ijerph14030273
M3 - Article
C2 - 28282878
AN - SCOPUS:85014809393
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 14
JO - International journal of environmental research and public health
JF - International journal of environmental research and public health
IS - 3
M1 - 273
ER -