TY - GEN
T1 - Optimized prediction of extreme treatment outcomes in ovarian cancer
AU - Misganaw, Burook
AU - Ahsen, Eren
AU - Singh, Nitin
AU - Baggerly, Keith A.
AU - Unruh, Anna
AU - White, Michael A.
AU - Vidyasagar, M.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (61172064,61233004,61473184), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program-2013CB035500), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M540364).
Funding Information:
BM, NS, EA and MV are with the Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX. KAB is with the Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. AU s a graduate student in the UT Graduate School of the Biomedical Sciences. MAW is with the UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. The work of BM, EA, NS and MV was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. ECCS-1306630, the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas under grant no. RP140517, the Cecil H. and Ida Green Endowment at UT Dallas, the Excellence in Education Endowment at UT Dallas, and the Johnson Family Graduate Fellowship Endowment. The work of KAB and AU was supported in part by CPRIT MIRA RP110690. The work of MAW was supported in part by CPRIT MIRA RP110595.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 IEEE.
PY - 2015/2/8
Y1 - 2015/2/8
N2 - The TCGA ovarian cancer database shows that about 10% of patients respond poorly to platinum-based chemotherapy, with tumors relapsing in seven months or less. At the other extreme, another 10% or so enjoy disease-free survival of three years or more [1]. At present there are more than a dozen prognostic signatures that claim to predict the survival prospects of a patient based on her genetic profile. Yet, according to [2], none of these signatures performs significantly better than pure guessing. Accordingly, in this paper the objective is to propose and validate another gene-based signature. TCGA ovarian cancer data is analyzed using the lone star algorithm [3] that is specifically developed for identifying a small number of highly predictive features from a very large set. Using this algorithm, we are able to identify a biomarker panel of 25 genes (out of 12,000) that can be used to classify patients into one of three groups: super-responders (SR), medium responders (MR), and non-responders (NR). We are also able to determine a discriminant function that can divide patients into two classes, such that there is a clear survival advantage of one group over the other. This signature is developed using the TCGA Agilent platform data, and cross-validated on the TCGA Affymetrix platform data, as well as entirely independent data due to Tothill et al. [4]. The P-value on the training data is below machine zero, while the P-values on cross-validation are well below the widely accepted threshold of 0.05.
AB - The TCGA ovarian cancer database shows that about 10% of patients respond poorly to platinum-based chemotherapy, with tumors relapsing in seven months or less. At the other extreme, another 10% or so enjoy disease-free survival of three years or more [1]. At present there are more than a dozen prognostic signatures that claim to predict the survival prospects of a patient based on her genetic profile. Yet, according to [2], none of these signatures performs significantly better than pure guessing. Accordingly, in this paper the objective is to propose and validate another gene-based signature. TCGA ovarian cancer data is analyzed using the lone star algorithm [3] that is specifically developed for identifying a small number of highly predictive features from a very large set. Using this algorithm, we are able to identify a biomarker panel of 25 genes (out of 12,000) that can be used to classify patients into one of three groups: super-responders (SR), medium responders (MR), and non-responders (NR). We are also able to determine a discriminant function that can divide patients into two classes, such that there is a clear survival advantage of one group over the other. This signature is developed using the TCGA Agilent platform data, and cross-validated on the TCGA Affymetrix platform data, as well as entirely independent data due to Tothill et al. [4]. The P-value on the training data is below machine zero, while the P-values on cross-validation are well below the widely accepted threshold of 0.05.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961989859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961989859&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/CDC.2015.7402383
DO - 10.1109/CDC.2015.7402383
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84961989859
T3 - Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
SP - 1254
EP - 1258
BT - 54rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,CDC 2015
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, CDC 2015
Y2 - 15 December 2015 through 18 December 2015
ER -