TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimal imaging surveillance after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer
T2 - Findings of an International Delphi Consensus Study
AU - Nguyen, Timothy K.
AU - Senan, Suresh
AU - Bradley, Jeffery D.
AU - Franks, Kevin
AU - Giuliani, Meredith
AU - Guckenberger, Matthias
AU - Landis, Mark
AU - Loo, Billy W.
AU - Louie, Alexander V.
AU - Onishi, Hiroshi
AU - Schmidt, Heidi
AU - Timmerman, Robert
AU - Videtic, Gregory M.M.
AU - Palma, David A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflicts of interest: BWL reports research grants from Varian Medical Systems, honoraria for educational lectures from Varian Medical Systems, research support from RaySearch Laboratories, and board membership and stock ownership in TibaRay, Inc. outside the submitted work. AVL reports personal fees from Variant Medical Systems Inc. outside the submitted work. SS reports other from Eli Lilly and AstraZeneca and grants from Varian Medical Systems outside the submitted work. RT reports grants from Varian Medical Systems, Elekta Oncology, and Accuray, Inc. outside the submitted work. DAP is supported by a Clinician-Scientist Grant from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Society for Radiation Oncology
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Purpose: Imaging after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer can detect recurrences and second primary lung cancers; however, the optimal follow-up practice of these patients remains unclear. We sought to establish consensus recommendations for surveillance after SABR. Methods and materials: International opinion leaders in thoracic radiation oncology and radiology were invited to participate (n = 31), with 11 accepting (9 radiation oncologists, 2 radiologists). Consensus-building was achieved using a 3-round Delphi process. Participants rated their agreement/disagreement with statements using a 5-point Likert scale. An a priori threshold of ≥75% agreement/disagreement was required for consensus. Results: A 100% response rate was achieved and final consensus statements were approved by all participants. The consensus statements were: (1.1) thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans should be ordered routinely in follow-up; (1.2) if there is a suspicion for local recurrence (LR), fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT scans are strongly recommended. Otherwise, there is limited evidence to guide routine use of fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography /CT; (1.3) CT imaging is not recommended at 6 weeks, but is recommended at months 3, 6, and 12 in year 1 and then every 6 months in year 2 and annually in years 3 through 5; (1.4) after 5 years, CT imaging should continue, although no consensus was reached regarding the frequency. (2.1) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria are not sufficient for detecting LR; (2.2) a formal scoring system, informed by validated data, should be used to classify high-risk imaging features predictive of LR; (2.3) CT findings suspicious for LR include: infiltration into adjacent structures, bulging margins, sustained growth, mass-like growth, spherical growth, craniocaudal growth, and loss of air bronchograms. (3) Salvage therapy without pathologic confirmation of recurrence is acceptable if imaging findings are highly suspicious and a biopsy is not safe/feasible or if an attempted biopsy was nondiagnostic. Conclusions: These guidelines provide international expert consensus on areas of uncertainty in the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients after SABR.
AB - Purpose: Imaging after stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer can detect recurrences and second primary lung cancers; however, the optimal follow-up practice of these patients remains unclear. We sought to establish consensus recommendations for surveillance after SABR. Methods and materials: International opinion leaders in thoracic radiation oncology and radiology were invited to participate (n = 31), with 11 accepting (9 radiation oncologists, 2 radiologists). Consensus-building was achieved using a 3-round Delphi process. Participants rated their agreement/disagreement with statements using a 5-point Likert scale. An a priori threshold of ≥75% agreement/disagreement was required for consensus. Results: A 100% response rate was achieved and final consensus statements were approved by all participants. The consensus statements were: (1.1) thoracic computed tomography (CT) scans should be ordered routinely in follow-up; (1.2) if there is a suspicion for local recurrence (LR), fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT scans are strongly recommended. Otherwise, there is limited evidence to guide routine use of fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography /CT; (1.3) CT imaging is not recommended at 6 weeks, but is recommended at months 3, 6, and 12 in year 1 and then every 6 months in year 2 and annually in years 3 through 5; (1.4) after 5 years, CT imaging should continue, although no consensus was reached regarding the frequency. (2.1) Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria are not sufficient for detecting LR; (2.2) a formal scoring system, informed by validated data, should be used to classify high-risk imaging features predictive of LR; (2.3) CT findings suspicious for LR include: infiltration into adjacent structures, bulging margins, sustained growth, mass-like growth, spherical growth, craniocaudal growth, and loss of air bronchograms. (3) Salvage therapy without pathologic confirmation of recurrence is acceptable if imaging findings are highly suspicious and a biopsy is not safe/feasible or if an attempted biopsy was nondiagnostic. Conclusions: These guidelines provide international expert consensus on areas of uncertainty in the management of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients after SABR.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039713224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039713224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2017.10.008
DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2017.10.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 29291965
AN - SCOPUS:85039713224
SN - 1879-8500
VL - 8
SP - e71-e78
JO - Practical Radiation Oncology
JF - Practical Radiation Oncology
IS - 2
ER -