Abstract
Following our call to join in the discussion over the suitability of implementing a reporting checklist for bio–nano papers, the community responds.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 629-635 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Nature Nanotechnology |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 7 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jul 1 2019 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Bioengineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Biomedical Engineering
- Materials Science(all)
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
In: Nature Nanotechnology, Vol. 14, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 629-635.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - On the issue of transparency and reproducibility in nanomedicine
AU - Leong, Hon S.
AU - Butler, Kimberly S.
AU - Brinker, C. Jeffrey
AU - Azzawi, May
AU - Conlan, Steve
AU - Dufés, Christine
AU - Owen, Andrew
AU - Rannard, Steve
AU - Scott, Chris
AU - Chen, Chunying
AU - Dobrovolskaia, Marina A.
AU - Kozlov, Serguei V.
AU - Prina-Mello, Adriele
AU - Schmid, Ruth
AU - Wick, Peter
AU - Caputo, Fanny
AU - Boisseau, Patrick
AU - Crist, Rachael M.
AU - McNeil, Scott E.
AU - Fadeel, Bengt
AU - Tran, Lang
AU - Hansen, Steffen Foss
AU - Hartmann, Nanna B.
AU - Clausen, Lauge P.W.
AU - Skjolding, Lars M.
AU - Baun, Anders
AU - Ågerstrand, Marlene
AU - Gu, Zhen
AU - Lamprou, Dimitrios A.
AU - Hoskins, Clare
AU - Huang, Leaf
AU - Song, Wantong
AU - Cao, Huiliang
AU - Liu, Xuanyong
AU - Jandt, Klaus D.
AU - Jiang, Wen
AU - Kim, Betty Y.S.
AU - Wheeler, Korin E.
AU - Chetwynd, Andrew J.
AU - Lynch, Iseult
AU - Moghimi, Seyed Moein
AU - Nel, André
AU - Xia, Tian
AU - Weiss, Paul S.
AU - Sarmento, Bruno
AU - das Neves, José
AU - Santos, Hélder A.
AU - Santos, Luis
AU - Mitragotri, Samir
AU - Little, Steve
AU - Peer, Dan
AU - Amiji, Mansoor M.
AU - Alonso, Maria José
AU - Petri-Fink, Alke
AU - Balog, Sandor
AU - Lee, Aaron
AU - Drasler, Barbara
AU - Rothen-Rutishauser, Barbara
AU - Wilhelm, Stefan
AU - Acar, Handan
AU - Harrison, Roger G.
AU - Mao, Chuanbin
AU - Mukherjee, Priyabrata
AU - Ramesh, Rajagopal
AU - McNally, Lacey R.
AU - Busatto, Sara
AU - Wolfram, Joy
AU - Bergese, Paolo
AU - Ferrari, Mauro
AU - Fang, Ronnie H.
AU - Zhang, Liangfang
AU - Zheng, Jie
AU - Peng, Chuanqi
AU - Du, Bujie
AU - Yu, Mengxiao
AU - Charron, Danielle M.
AU - Zheng, Gang
AU - Pastore, Chiara
N1 - Funding Information: The European Nanomedicine Characterisation Laboratory (EUNCL) and the REFINE consortium effort, funded by EC-H2020, are aimed at developing a regulatory science framework for nanomedicine. EUNCL/REFINE, jointly with the National Cancer Institute’s Nanotechnology Characterization Lab (NCI-NCL), are bridging the gap between publication and translation by identifying common pitfalls in nanomedicine development, defining quality attributes for pre-clinical assessment and sharing lessons learned8–11. Recognizing the value of the MIRIBEL reporting suggestions, we emphasize that each particle is unique and may have different testing requirements. It is the view of EUNCL/REFINE and NCI-NCL that the developmental path to translation should have a series of pass/fail analyses early in the process8,9. Built on our combined experiences, aspects such as sterility and endotoxin contamination, physicochemical characterization in complex biological media11, and multiparametric investigations of immuno-and cytotoxicity responses can uncover potential show-stopper toxicities12, calling for refinement of the formulation. Only then should the in vivo efficacy/safety studies commence13. Further, we support the adoption of orthogonal methodologies11, which can be highly informative with regards to the overall properties and performance of the product. Success is best achieved through a rigorous approach that is well-defined, thorough and makes use of validated assays (http://www.euncl.eu/about-us/ assay-cascade) and experimental standard operative procedures (https://ncl.cancer. gov/resources/assay-cascade-protocols) with defined quality acceptance criteria. Failure to adopt these criteria often leads to confounding results, lack of reproducibility and, ultimately, lost time and money. Supporting these minimum reporting and characterization recommendations will greatly advance nanomedicine development, which has been curtailed by the lack of comprehensive characterization data in the literature. Funding Information: Adriele Prina-Mello, Ruth Schmid, Peter Wick, Fanny Caputo, Patrick Boisseau, Rachael M. Crist and Scott E. McNeil: the view expressed in this Correspondence is reflective of the European Nanomedicine Characterisation Laboratory (EUNCL EC-H2020 ref. 654190) and the REFINE consortium (REFINE EC-H2020 ref. 761104). The work of authors Rachael M. Crist and Scott E. McNeil has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, under contract no. HHSN261200800001E. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organizations imply endorsement by the US government. Funding Information: Kimberly S. Butler, Hon S. Leong and C. Jeffrey Brinker: Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the US Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DENA0003525. Any subjective views or opinions that might be expressed in the paper do not necessarily represent the views of the US Department of Energy or the US government. Publisher Copyright: © 2019, Springer Nature Limited.
PY - 2019/7/1
Y1 - 2019/7/1
N2 - Following our call to join in the discussion over the suitability of implementing a reporting checklist for bio–nano papers, the community responds.
AB - Following our call to join in the discussion over the suitability of implementing a reporting checklist for bio–nano papers, the community responds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069268486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85069268486&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41565-019-0496-9
DO - 10.1038/s41565-019-0496-9
M3 - Letter
C2 - 31270452
AN - SCOPUS:85069268486
SN - 1748-3387
VL - 14
SP - 629
EP - 635
JO - Nature Nanotechnology
JF - Nature Nanotechnology
IS - 7
ER -