TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-visible haematuria for the Detection of Bladder, Upper Tract, and Kidney Cancer
T2 - An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
AU - Jubber, Ibrahim
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
AU - Conroy, Samantha
AU - Tan, Wei Shen
AU - Gordon, Patrick C.
AU - Lotan, Yair
AU - Messing, Edward M.
AU - Stenzl, Arnulf
AU - Rhijn, Bas van
AU - Kelly, John D.
AU - Catto, James W.F.
AU - Cumberbatch, Marcus G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 European Association of Urology
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Context: Non-visible haematuria (NVH) is a common finding and may indicate undiagnosed urological cancer. The optimal investigation of NVH is unclear, given the incidence of cancer and the public health implications of testing all individuals with this finding. Objective: We review contemporary literature to determine the association of NVH with the diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC), upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and kidney cancer (KC). Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of original articles in English was completed in May 2019. Meta-analyses for the diagnostic accuracy of NVH and urine cytology were performed. Evidence synthesis: We screened 1529 articles and selected 78 manuscripts that fulfilled our inclusion criteria for narrative synthesis. Forty manuscripts were eligible for a meta-analysis (reporting 19 193 persons). The likelihood of a urological cancer in patients with NVH increased with age (<1% in those aged <40 yr), male sex, and cigarette smoking. Less than 1% of patients are found to have a urological cancer after a negative NVH evaluation. Cancer detection rates in individuals evaluated for NVH ranged from 0% to 16% for BC in 37 studies, 0% to 3.5% for UTUC in 30 studies, and 0% to 9.7% for KC in 29 studies. Substantial statistical heterogeneity was present for the meta-analysis of detection rates. Conclusions: We present an up-to-date review of the association of NVH with the diagnosis of BC, UTUC, and KC. Individuals with dipstick positive haematuria aged ≥40 yr, who have had potential precipitating causes excluded, should undergo an evaluation. Re-evaluation of patients with unremarkable initial investigations should be performed in high-risk patients or if new symptoms occur. Patient summary: One in five people have microscopic traces of blood in their urine. This is an important indicator of urological cancer. Investigating all patients is uncomfortable and expensive. We evaluate the risk of cancer and estimate risks to groups of individuals. Up to 20% of the general population have non-visible haematuria (NVH). NVH is an important indicator of urological malignancy, particularly in individuals ≥40 yr of age. Evaluation should include cystoscopy and upper tract imaging in the form of ultrasound or computed tomography urogram.
AB - Context: Non-visible haematuria (NVH) is a common finding and may indicate undiagnosed urological cancer. The optimal investigation of NVH is unclear, given the incidence of cancer and the public health implications of testing all individuals with this finding. Objective: We review contemporary literature to determine the association of NVH with the diagnosis of bladder cancer (BC), upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and kidney cancer (KC). Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of original articles in English was completed in May 2019. Meta-analyses for the diagnostic accuracy of NVH and urine cytology were performed. Evidence synthesis: We screened 1529 articles and selected 78 manuscripts that fulfilled our inclusion criteria for narrative synthesis. Forty manuscripts were eligible for a meta-analysis (reporting 19 193 persons). The likelihood of a urological cancer in patients with NVH increased with age (<1% in those aged <40 yr), male sex, and cigarette smoking. Less than 1% of patients are found to have a urological cancer after a negative NVH evaluation. Cancer detection rates in individuals evaluated for NVH ranged from 0% to 16% for BC in 37 studies, 0% to 3.5% for UTUC in 30 studies, and 0% to 9.7% for KC in 29 studies. Substantial statistical heterogeneity was present for the meta-analysis of detection rates. Conclusions: We present an up-to-date review of the association of NVH with the diagnosis of BC, UTUC, and KC. Individuals with dipstick positive haematuria aged ≥40 yr, who have had potential precipitating causes excluded, should undergo an evaluation. Re-evaluation of patients with unremarkable initial investigations should be performed in high-risk patients or if new symptoms occur. Patient summary: One in five people have microscopic traces of blood in their urine. This is an important indicator of urological cancer. Investigating all patients is uncomfortable and expensive. We evaluate the risk of cancer and estimate risks to groups of individuals. Up to 20% of the general population have non-visible haematuria (NVH). NVH is an important indicator of urological malignancy, particularly in individuals ≥40 yr of age. Evaluation should include cystoscopy and upper tract imaging in the form of ultrasound or computed tomography urogram.
KW - Bladder cancer
KW - Kidney cancer
KW - Microscopic haematuria
KW - Non-visible haematuria
KW - Upper tract urothelial cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076209873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076209873&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.010
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.10.010
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31791622
AN - SCOPUS:85076209873
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 77
SP - 583
EP - 598
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 5
ER -