Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine–carboplatin versus gemcitabine–cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Sarah M.H. Einerhand, Anna J. Black, Homayoun Zargar, Adrian S. Fairey, Colin P. Dinney, Maria C. Mir, Laura Maria Krabbe, Michael S. Cookson, Niels Erik Jacobson, Jeffrey S. Montgomery, Nikhil Vasdev, Evan Y. Yu, Evanguelos Xylinas, Wassim Kassouf, Marc A. Dall’Era, Srikala S. Sridhar, Jonathan S. McGrath, Jonathan Aning, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Jonathan L. WrightAndrew C. Thorpe, Todd M. Morgan, Jeff M. Holzbeierlein, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Scott North, Daniel A. Barocas, Yair Lotan, Petros Grivas, Jorge A. Garcia, Andrew J. Stephenson, Jay B. Shah, Siamak Daneshmand, Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari, Philippe E. Spiess, Bas W.G. van Rhijn, Peter C. Black, Laura S. Mertens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy (RC) is recommended in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). However, up to 50% of patients are cisplatin ineligible. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes after ≥ 3 cycles of preoperative gemcitabine–carboplatin (gem–carbo) versus gemcitabine–cisplatin (gem–cis). Methods: We identified 1865 patients treated at 19 centers between 2000 and 2013. Patients were included if they had received ≥ 3 cycles of neoadjuvant (cT2-4aN0M0) or induction (cTanyN + M0) gem–carbo or gem–cis followed by RC. Results: We included 747 patients treated with gem–carbo (n = 147) or gem–cis (n = 600). Patients treated with gem–carbo had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.016) and more clinically node-positive disease (32% versus 20%; p = 0.013). The complete pathological response (pCR; ypT0N0) rate did not significantly differ between gem–carbo and gem–cis (20.7% versus 22.1%; p = 0.73). Chemotherapeutic regimen was not significantly associated with pCR (OR 0.99 [95%CI 0.61–1.59]; p = 0.96), overall survival (OS) (HR 1.20 [95%CI 0.85–1.67]; p = 0.31), or cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR 1.35 [95%CI 0.93–1.96]; p = 0.11). Median OS of patients treated with gem–carbo and gem–cis was 28.6 months (95%CI 18.1–39.1) and 45.1 months (95%CI 32.7–57.6) (p = 0.18), respectively. Median CSS of patients treated with gem–carbo and gem–cis was 28.8 months (95%CI 9.8–47.8) and 71.0 months (95%CI median not reached) (p = 0.02), respectively. Subanalyses of the neoadjuvant and induction setting did not show significant survival differences. Conclusion: Our results show that a subset of cisplatin-ineligible patients with MIBC achieve pCR on gem–carbo and that survival outcomes seem comparable to gem–cis provided patients are able to receive ≥ 3 cycles and undergo RC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2707-2715
Number of pages9
JournalWorld journal of urology
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Keywords

  • Bladder
  • Carboplatin
  • Chemotherapy
  • Cisplatin
  • Neoadjuvant
  • Radical cystectomy
  • Urothelial cancer

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multicenter evaluation of neoadjuvant and induction gemcitabine–carboplatin versus gemcitabine–cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this