TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer
AU - Zargar, Homayoun
AU - Espiritu, Patrick N.
AU - Fairey, Adrian S.
AU - Mertens, Laura S.
AU - Dinney, Colin P.
AU - Mir, Maria C.
AU - Krabbe, Laura Maria
AU - Cookson, Michael S.
AU - Jacobsen, Niels Erik
AU - Gandhi, Nilay M.
AU - Griffin, Joshua
AU - Montgomery, Jeffrey S.
AU - Vasdev, Nikhil
AU - Yu, Evan Y.
AU - Youssef, David
AU - Xylinas, Evanguelos
AU - Campain, Nicholas J.
AU - Kassouf, Wassim
AU - Dall'Era, Marc A.
AU - Seah, Jo An
AU - Ercole, Cesar E.
AU - Horenblas, Simon
AU - Sridhar, Srikala S.
AU - McGrath, John S.
AU - Aning, Jonathan
AU - Shariat, Shahrokh F.
AU - Wright, Jonathan L.
AU - Thorpe, Andrew C.
AU - Morgan, Todd M.
AU - Holzbeierlein, Jeff M.
AU - Bivalacqua, Trinity J.
AU - North, Scott
AU - Barocas, Daniel A.
AU - Lotan, Yair
AU - Garcia, Jorge A.
AU - Stephenson, Andrew J.
AU - Shah, Jay B.
AU - Van Rhijn, Bas W.
AU - Daneshmand, Siamak
AU - Spiess, Philippe E.
AU - Black, Peter C.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial disclosures: Peter C. Black certifies that all conflicts of interest, including specific financial interests and relationships and affiliations relevant to the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript (eg, employment/affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, or patents filed, received, or pending), are the following: Daniel A. Barocas has had a role as consultant/ad board with compensation for Janssen and Dendreon and has been a consultant with compensation for GE Healthcare. Siamak Daneshmand has been a member of the Speakers Bureau for Endo and Cubist. Peter C. Black has received grant funding from GenomeDx and honoraria/speaking from Janssen, Astellas, Ferring, and Amgen (not related to this project).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Background The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) was established primarily with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), with complete response rates (pT0) as high as 38%. However, because of the comparable efficacy with better tolerability of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with metastatic disease, GC has become the most commonly used regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. Objective We aimed to assess real-world pathologic response rates to NAC with different regimens in a large, multicenter cohort. Design, setting, and participants Data were collected retrospectively at 19 centers on patients with clinical cT2-4aN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who received at least three cycles of NAC, followed by radical cystectomy (RC), between 2000 and 2013. Intervention NAC and RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary outcome was pathologic stage at cystectomy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors predictive of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 stages. Results and limitations Data were collected on 935 patients who met inclusion criteria. GC was used in the majority of the patients (n = 602; 64.4%), followed by MVAC (n = 183; 19.6%) and other regimens (n = 144; 15.4%). The rates of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 pathologic response were 22.7% and 40.8%, respectively. The rate of pT0N0 disease for patients receiving GC was 23.9%, compared with 24.5% for MVAC (p = 0.2). There was no difference between MVAC and GC in pT0N0 on multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.34]; p = 0.6). Conclusions Response rates to NAC were lower than those reported in prospective randomized trials, and we did not discern a difference between MVAC and GC. Without any evidence from randomized prospective trials, the best NAC regimen for invasive BCa remains to be determined. Patient summary There was no apparent difference in the response rates to the two most common presurgical chemotherapy regimens for patients with bladder cancer.
AB - Background The efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) was established primarily with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC), with complete response rates (pT0) as high as 38%. However, because of the comparable efficacy with better tolerability of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) in patients with metastatic disease, GC has become the most commonly used regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. Objective We aimed to assess real-world pathologic response rates to NAC with different regimens in a large, multicenter cohort. Design, setting, and participants Data were collected retrospectively at 19 centers on patients with clinical cT2-4aN0M0 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who received at least three cycles of NAC, followed by radical cystectomy (RC), between 2000 and 2013. Intervention NAC and RC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The primary outcome was pathologic stage at cystectomy. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to determine factors predictive of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 stages. Results and limitations Data were collected on 935 patients who met inclusion criteria. GC was used in the majority of the patients (n = 602; 64.4%), followed by MVAC (n = 183; 19.6%) and other regimens (n = 144; 15.4%). The rates of pT0N0 and ≤pT1N0 pathologic response were 22.7% and 40.8%, respectively. The rate of pT0N0 disease for patients receiving GC was 23.9%, compared with 24.5% for MVAC (p = 0.2). There was no difference between MVAC and GC in pT0N0 on multivariable analysis (odds ratio: 0.89 [95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.34]; p = 0.6). Conclusions Response rates to NAC were lower than those reported in prospective randomized trials, and we did not discern a difference between MVAC and GC. Without any evidence from randomized prospective trials, the best NAC regimen for invasive BCa remains to be determined. Patient summary There was no apparent difference in the response rates to the two most common presurgical chemotherapy regimens for patients with bladder cancer.
KW - Complete pathologic response
KW - Cystectomy
KW - GC
KW - MVAC
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Partial pathologic response
KW - Urothelial cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920658106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920658106&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.007
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.09.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 25257030
AN - SCOPUS:84920658106
SN - 0302-2838
VL - 67
SP - 241
EP - 249
JO - European Urology
JF - European Urology
IS - 2
ER -