TY - JOUR
T1 - Mitigating the risk of artificial intelligence bias in cardiovascular care
AU - Mihan, Ariana
AU - Pandey, Ambarish
AU - Van Spall, Harriette GC
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Digital health technologies can generate data that can be used to train artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, which have been particularly transformative in cardiovascular health-care delivery. However, digital and health-care data repositories that are used to train AI algorithms can introduce bias when data are homogeneous and health-care processes are inequitable. AI bias can also be introduced during algorithm development, testing, implementation, and post-implementation processes. The consequences of AI algorithmic bias can be considerable, including missed diagnoses, misclassification of disease, incorrect risk prediction, and inappropriate treatment recommendations. This bias can disproportionately affect marginalised demographic groups. In this Series paper, we provide a brief overview of AI applications in cardiovascular health care, discuss stages of algorithm development and associated sources of bias, and provide examples of harm from biased algorithms. We propose strategies that can be applied during the training, testing, and implementation of AI algorithms to mitigate bias so that all those at risk for or living with cardiovascular disease might benefit equally from AI.
AB - Digital health technologies can generate data that can be used to train artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, which have been particularly transformative in cardiovascular health-care delivery. However, digital and health-care data repositories that are used to train AI algorithms can introduce bias when data are homogeneous and health-care processes are inequitable. AI bias can also be introduced during algorithm development, testing, implementation, and post-implementation processes. The consequences of AI algorithmic bias can be considerable, including missed diagnoses, misclassification of disease, incorrect risk prediction, and inappropriate treatment recommendations. This bias can disproportionately affect marginalised demographic groups. In this Series paper, we provide a brief overview of AI applications in cardiovascular health care, discuss stages of algorithm development and associated sources of bias, and provide examples of harm from biased algorithms. We propose strategies that can be applied during the training, testing, and implementation of AI algorithms to mitigate bias so that all those at risk for or living with cardiovascular disease might benefit equally from AI.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203837478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203837478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00155-9
DO - 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00155-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39214762
AN - SCOPUS:85203837478
SN - 2589-7500
VL - 6
SP - e749-e754
JO - The Lancet Digital Health
JF - The Lancet Digital Health
IS - 10
ER -