TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring asymmetry in facial morphea via 3-dimensional stereophotogrammetry
AU - Abbas, Laila F.
AU - Joseph, Adrienne K.
AU - Day, Jennifer
AU - Cole, Naomi A.
AU - Hallac, Rami
AU - Derderian, Christopher
AU - Jacobe, Heidi T.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - Background: Objectively determining tissue loss in craniofacial morphea is challenging. However, 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry is a noninvasive modality that may be a useful adjunct. Objective: To prospectively evaluate 3D stereophotogrammetry in the assessment of craniofacial linear morphea. Methods: Participants underwent clinical, quality-of-life, and 3D-stereophotogrammetry assessments. Traditional photographs and 3D-stereophotogrammetry images were rated as mild, moderate, or severe by 2 experts and 2 nonexperts. In addition, interrater and intrarater reliability (on delayed rescoring) were calculated. Results: Of 23 patients with craniofacial morphea, 3D stereophotogrammetry detected pathologic asymmetry in 14 (20.6%) patients. Providers rated patients as more severely affected when using 3D stereophotogrammetry versus when using traditional photographs (19% severe on 3D stereophotogrammetry vs 0% severe on traditional photographs, P = .004). Qualitative ratings of both traditional and 3D images showed high inter- and intrarater reliability between experts and nonexperts alike. Physicians’ Global Assessment of Damage scores correlated with mouth asymmetry (P = .0021), cheek asymmetry (P = .04), and 3D-stereophotogrammetry ratings (median, mild: 27.5 vs moderate: 46.5 vs severe: 64, P = .0152). Lower face asymmetry correlated with worse quality-of-life scores (P = .013). Limitations: Small sample size and cross-sectional design. Conclusion: 3D stereophotogrammetry can reliably detect and quantify asymmetry in craniofacial morphea with greater sensitivity than that observed with traditional assessment alone. 3D stereophotogrammetry may be a useful adjunct to clinical examination.
AB - Background: Objectively determining tissue loss in craniofacial morphea is challenging. However, 3-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry is a noninvasive modality that may be a useful adjunct. Objective: To prospectively evaluate 3D stereophotogrammetry in the assessment of craniofacial linear morphea. Methods: Participants underwent clinical, quality-of-life, and 3D-stereophotogrammetry assessments. Traditional photographs and 3D-stereophotogrammetry images were rated as mild, moderate, or severe by 2 experts and 2 nonexperts. In addition, interrater and intrarater reliability (on delayed rescoring) were calculated. Results: Of 23 patients with craniofacial morphea, 3D stereophotogrammetry detected pathologic asymmetry in 14 (20.6%) patients. Providers rated patients as more severely affected when using 3D stereophotogrammetry versus when using traditional photographs (19% severe on 3D stereophotogrammetry vs 0% severe on traditional photographs, P = .004). Qualitative ratings of both traditional and 3D images showed high inter- and intrarater reliability between experts and nonexperts alike. Physicians’ Global Assessment of Damage scores correlated with mouth asymmetry (P = .0021), cheek asymmetry (P = .04), and 3D-stereophotogrammetry ratings (median, mild: 27.5 vs moderate: 46.5 vs severe: 64, P = .0152). Lower face asymmetry correlated with worse quality-of-life scores (P = .013). Limitations: Small sample size and cross-sectional design. Conclusion: 3D stereophotogrammetry can reliably detect and quantify asymmetry in craniofacial morphea with greater sensitivity than that observed with traditional assessment alone. 3D stereophotogrammetry may be a useful adjunct to clinical examination.
KW - 3D-stereophotogrammetry
KW - Parry Romberg syndrome
KW - craniofacial morphea
KW - imaging
KW - localized scleroderma
KW - morphea
KW - morphea en coup de sabre
KW - rheumatologic dermatology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85143275549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85143275549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.05.029
DO - 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.05.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 35643243
AN - SCOPUS:85143275549
SN - 0190-9622
VL - 88
SP - 101
EP - 108
JO - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
JF - Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
IS - 1
ER -