Magnetic resonance urography

John R. Leyendecker, John W. Gianini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations


Excellent contrast resolution and lack of ionizing radiation make magnetic resonance urography (MRU) a promising technique for noninvasively evaluating the entire urinary tract. While MRU currently lags behind CT urography (CTU) in spatial resolution and efficiency, new hardware and sequence developments have contributed to a resurgence of interest in MRU techniques. By combining unenhanced sequences with multiphase contrast-enhanced and excretory phase imaging, a comprehensive assessment of the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and surrounding structures is possible with image quality rivaling that obtained with other techniques. At the same time, formidable challenges remain to be overcome and further clinical validation is necessary before MRU can replace other forms of urography. In this article, we demonstrate the current potential of MRU to demonstrate a spectrum of urologic pathology involving the kidneys, ureters, and bladder while discussing the limitations and current status of this evolving technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)527-540
Number of pages14
JournalAbdominal Imaging
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009


  • Kidney
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Ureters
  • Urinary system
  • Urography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Gastroenterology
  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Magnetic resonance urography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this