Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

Philip E. Greilich; William E. Johnston

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511733253.011

Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

Philip E. Greilich, William E. Johnston

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The clinical assessment of a patient’s volume status using physical examination and vital signs is often misleading. Bedside patient examination is only 30–50% accurate and clinical tests for assessing hypovolemia suffer from excessive observer bias and variability as well as poor reproducibility, interobserver agreement and sensitivity.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting
Publisher	Cambridge University Press
Pages	82-90
Number of pages	9
ISBN (Electronic)	9780511733253
ISBN (Print)	9781107000988
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733253.011
State	Published - Jan 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

10.1017/CBO9780511733253.011

Cite this

@inbook{65dd5dffcd5e48329ee536568391fe8f,

title = "Invasive hemodynamic monitoring",

abstract = "The clinical assessment of a patient{\textquoteright}s volume status using physical examination and vital signs is often misleading. Bedside patient examination is only 30–50% accurate and clinical tests for assessing hypovolemia suffer from excessive observer bias and variability as well as poor reproducibility, interobserver agreement and sensitivity.",

author = "Greilich, {Philip E.} and Johnston, {William E.}",

year = "2011",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511733253.011",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781107000988",

pages = "82--90",

booktitle = "Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

AU - Greilich, Philip E.

AU - Johnston, William E.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - The clinical assessment of a patient’s volume status using physical examination and vital signs is often misleading. Bedside patient examination is only 30–50% accurate and clinical tests for assessing hypovolemia suffer from excessive observer bias and variability as well as poor reproducibility, interobserver agreement and sensitivity.

AB - The clinical assessment of a patient’s volume status using physical examination and vital signs is often misleading. Bedside patient examination is only 30–50% accurate and clinical tests for assessing hypovolemia suffer from excessive observer bias and variability as well as poor reproducibility, interobserver agreement and sensitivity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926110186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926110186&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511733253.011

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511733253.011

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84926110186

SN - 9781107000988

SP - 82

EP - 90

BT - Clinical Fluid Therapy in the Perioperative Setting

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Invasive hemodynamic monitoring

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this