TY - JOUR
T1 - Increased risk of severe hypoglycemic events before and after cardiovascular outcomes in TECOSSuggests an at-risk type 2 diabetes frail patient phenotype
AU - Standl, Eberhard
AU - Stevens, Susanna R.
AU - Armstrong, Paul W.
AU - Buse, John B.
AU - Chan, Juliana C.N.
AU - Green, Jennifer B.
AU - Lachin, John M.
AU - Scheen, Andre
AU - Travert, Florence
AU - Van De Werf, Frans
AU - Peterson, Eric D.
AU - Holman, Rury R.
N1 - Funding Information:
ployee of DCRI, provided editorial support. Funding. R.R.H. is a National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator. The TECOS trial was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ. The study was designed and run independently by the DCRI and the University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit in an academic collaboration with the sponsor.
Funding Information:
All analyses were performed by DCRI and the University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit independent of the sponsor. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, all analyses, the drafting and editing of the manuscript,andits finalcontents. All authors agreed to submit the report for publication, and the funder had no role in this decision. Duality of Interest. E.S. has received personal fees from the University of Oxford Diabetes Trials Unit, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Serono-EXCEMED, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. P.W.A. has received grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme. J.B.B. has received contracted consulting fees, paid to his institution, and travel support from Adocia, AstraZeneca, Dance Biopharm, Dexcom, Elcelyx Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Fractyl, GI Dynamics, Intarcia Therapeutics, Lexicon, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Metav-ention, NovaTarg, Novo Nordisk, Orexigen, PhaseBio, Sanofi, Shenzhen HighTide, Takeda, and vTv Therapeutics and grant support from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, GI Dynamics, GlaxoSmithKline, Intarcia Therapeutics, Johnson & Johnson, Lexicon, Medtronic, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Orexigen, Sanofi, Scion NeuroStim, Takeda, Theracos, and vTv Therapeutics. He has received fees and holds stock options in Insulin Algorithms and PhaseBio and serves on the board of the AstraZeneca HealthCare Foundation. He is supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001111). J.C.N.C. has received consulting and speaker fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, and her affiliated institutions have received research and educational grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme. J.B.G. has received grants from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, and personal fees from Boehringer Ingel-heim and Daiichi Sankyo. J.M.L. has received personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme via Oxford University and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, and Novartis. A.S. has received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi. F.T. has received personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eli Lilly, and AstraZeneca. F.V.d.W. has received personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme. E.D.P. has received grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Sanofi. R.R.H. reports receiving grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study; grants and personal fees from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.; personal fees from Novartis, Amgen, and Servier; and financial support from Elcelyx, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, and Takeda outside the submitted work. No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported. Author Contributions. E.S. contributed to the study design and data analysis and interpretation and drafted and edited the manuscript. S.R.S. performed the statistical analysis and edited the manuscript. P.W.A., J.B.B., J.C.N.C., J.B.G., J.M.L., A.S., F.T., F.V.d.W., and E.D.P. edited the manuscript. R.R.H. contributed to the study design and data analysis and interpretation and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final submitted report. E.S. and R.R.H. are the guarantors of this work and, as such, had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility fortheintegrityofthedataandtheaccuracyofthe data analysis. Prior Presentation. Parts of this work were pre-sentedattheEuropeanSocietyofCardiologyCongress 2016, Rome, Italy, 27–31 August 2016; at the 2nd Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit of the Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease EASD Study Group, Munich, Germany, 20–21 October 2016; and at the World Diabetes Congress of the International Diabetes Federation 2017, Abu Dhabi, 4–8 December 2017.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by The American Diabetes Association.
PY - 2018/3/1
Y1 - 2018/3/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE Severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs) in type 2 diabetes are associated with subsequent cardiovascular (CV) event risk.We examined whether CV events were associated with subsequent SHE risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Time-dependent associations between SHEs and a composite CV end point (fatal/ nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure [hHF]) were examined post hoc in 14,671 TECOS (Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sitagliptin) participants with type 2 diabetes and CV disease followed for a median of 3.0 years. RESULTS SHEs were uncommon and unassociated with sitagliptin therapy (N = 160 [2.2%], 0.78/100 patient-years vs. N = 143 [1.9%], 0.70/100 patient-years for placebo; hazard ratio [HR] 1.12 [95%CI 0.89, 1.40], P = 0.33). Patientswith (versus without) SHEswere older with longer diabetes duration, lower body weight, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate;weremore frequentlywomen, nonwhite, and insulin treated; and more often had microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria. Analyses adjusted for clinical factors showed SHEs were associated with increased risk of the primary composite CV end point (1.55 [1.06, 2.28], P = 0.025), all-cause death (1.83 [1.22, 2.75], P = 0.004), and CV death (1.72 [1.02, 2.87], P = 0.040). Conversely, nonfatal myocardial infarction (3.02 [1.83, 4.96], P < 0.001), nonfatal stroke (2.77 [1.36, 5.63], P = 0.005), and hHF (3.68 [2.13, 6.36], P < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of SHEs. Fully adjusted models showed no association between SHEs and subsequent CV or hHF events, but the association between CV events and subsequent SHEs remained robust. CONCLUSIONS These findings, showing greater risk of SHEs after CV events and greater risk of CV events after SHEs, suggest a common at-risk type 2 diabetes frail patient phenotype.
AB - OBJECTIVE Severe hypoglycemic events (SHEs) in type 2 diabetes are associated with subsequent cardiovascular (CV) event risk.We examined whether CV events were associated with subsequent SHE risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Time-dependent associations between SHEs and a composite CV end point (fatal/ nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure [hHF]) were examined post hoc in 14,671 TECOS (Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes With Sitagliptin) participants with type 2 diabetes and CV disease followed for a median of 3.0 years. RESULTS SHEs were uncommon and unassociated with sitagliptin therapy (N = 160 [2.2%], 0.78/100 patient-years vs. N = 143 [1.9%], 0.70/100 patient-years for placebo; hazard ratio [HR] 1.12 [95%CI 0.89, 1.40], P = 0.33). Patientswith (versus without) SHEswere older with longer diabetes duration, lower body weight, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate;weremore frequentlywomen, nonwhite, and insulin treated; and more often had microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria. Analyses adjusted for clinical factors showed SHEs were associated with increased risk of the primary composite CV end point (1.55 [1.06, 2.28], P = 0.025), all-cause death (1.83 [1.22, 2.75], P = 0.004), and CV death (1.72 [1.02, 2.87], P = 0.040). Conversely, nonfatal myocardial infarction (3.02 [1.83, 4.96], P < 0.001), nonfatal stroke (2.77 [1.36, 5.63], P = 0.005), and hHF (3.68 [2.13, 6.36], P < 0.001) were associated with increased risk of SHEs. Fully adjusted models showed no association between SHEs and subsequent CV or hHF events, but the association between CV events and subsequent SHEs remained robust. CONCLUSIONS These findings, showing greater risk of SHEs after CV events and greater risk of CV events after SHEs, suggest a common at-risk type 2 diabetes frail patient phenotype.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042599018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042599018&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2337/dc17-1778
DO - 10.2337/dc17-1778
M3 - Article
C2 - 29311155
AN - SCOPUS:85042599018
SN - 1935-5548
VL - 41
SP - 596
EP - 603
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 3
ER -