TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving lung function in severe heterogenous Emphysema with the Spiration Valve System (EMPROVE) a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled clinical trial
AU - Criner, Gerard J.
AU - Delage, Antoine
AU - Voelker, Kirk
AU - Hogarth, D. Kyle
AU - Majid, Adnan
AU - Zgoda, Michael
AU - Lazarus, Donald R.
AU - Casal, Roberto
AU - Benzaquen, Sadia B.
AU - Holladay, Robert C.
AU - Wellikoff, Adam
AU - Calero, Karel
AU - Rumbak, Mark J.
AU - Branca, Paul R.
AU - Abu-Hijleh, Muhanned
AU - Mallea, Jorge M.
AU - Kalhan, Ravi
AU - Sachdeva, Ashutosh
AU - Kinsey, C. Matthew
AU - Lamb, Carla R.
AU - Reed, Michael F.
AU - Abouzgheib, Wissam B.
AU - Kaplan, Phillip V.
AU - Marrujo, Gregory X.
AU - Johnstone, David W.
AU - Gasparri, Mario G.
AU - Meade, Arturo A.
AU - Hergott, Christopher A.
AU - Reddy, Chakravarthy
AU - Mularski, Richard A.
AU - Case, Amy Hajari
AU - Makani, Samir S.
AU - Shepherd, Ray W.
AU - Chen, Benson
AU - Holt, Gregory E.
AU - Martel, Simon
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by Spiration Inc. d.b.a. Olympus Respiratory America funding of the EMPROVE trial. Spiration Inc. d.b.a. Olympus Respiratory America helped with trial design and review and clarification of the methods of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 by the American Thoracic Society.
PY - 2019/12/1
Y1 - 2019/12/1
N2 - Rationale: Less invasive, nonsurgical approaches are needed to treat severe emphysema. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) versus optimal medical management. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, subjects aged 40 years or older with severe, heterogeneous emphysema were randomized 2:1 to SVS with medical management (treatment) or medical management alone (control). Measurements and Main Results: The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in mean FEV1 from baseline to 6 months. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included: Difference in FEV1 responder rates, target lobe volume reduction, hyperinflation, health status, dyspnea, and exercise capacity. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of composite thoracic serious adverse events. All analyses were conducted by determining the 95% Bayesian credible intervals (BCIs) for the difference between treatment and control arms. Between October 2013 and May 2017, 172 participants (53.5% male; mean age, 67.4 yr) were randomized to treatment (n = 113) or control (n = 59). Mean FEV1 showed statistically significant improvements between the treatment and control groups- between-group difference at 6 and 12 months, respectively, of 0.101 L (95% BCI, 0.060-0.141) and 0.099 L (95% BCI, 0.048-0.151). At 6 months, the treatment group had statistically significant improvements in all secondary endpoints except 6-minute-walk distance. Composite thoracic serious adverse event incidence through 6 months was greater in the treatment group (31.0% vs. 11.9%), primarily due to a 12.4% incidence of serious pneumothorax. Conclusions: In patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema, the SVS shows significant improvement in multiple efficacy outcomes, with an acceptable safety profile.
AB - Rationale: Less invasive, nonsurgical approaches are needed to treat severe emphysema. Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Spiration Valve System (SVS) versus optimal medical management. Methods: In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial, subjects aged 40 years or older with severe, heterogeneous emphysema were randomized 2:1 to SVS with medical management (treatment) or medical management alone (control). Measurements and Main Results: The primary efficacy outcome was the difference in mean FEV1 from baseline to 6 months. Secondary effectiveness outcomes included: Difference in FEV1 responder rates, target lobe volume reduction, hyperinflation, health status, dyspnea, and exercise capacity. The primary safety outcome was the incidence of composite thoracic serious adverse events. All analyses were conducted by determining the 95% Bayesian credible intervals (BCIs) for the difference between treatment and control arms. Between October 2013 and May 2017, 172 participants (53.5% male; mean age, 67.4 yr) were randomized to treatment (n = 113) or control (n = 59). Mean FEV1 showed statistically significant improvements between the treatment and control groups- between-group difference at 6 and 12 months, respectively, of 0.101 L (95% BCI, 0.060-0.141) and 0.099 L (95% BCI, 0.048-0.151). At 6 months, the treatment group had statistically significant improvements in all secondary endpoints except 6-minute-walk distance. Composite thoracic serious adverse event incidence through 6 months was greater in the treatment group (31.0% vs. 11.9%), primarily due to a 12.4% incidence of serious pneumothorax. Conclusions: In patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema, the SVS shows significant improvement in multiple efficacy outcomes, with an acceptable safety profile.
KW - Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
KW - FEV
KW - Quality of life
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075813055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075813055&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1164/rccm.201902-0383OC
DO - 10.1164/rccm.201902-0383OC
M3 - Article
C2 - 31365298
AN - SCOPUS:85075813055
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 200
SP - 1354
EP - 1362
JO - American Review of Respiratory Disease
JF - American Review of Respiratory Disease
IS - 11
ER -