TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved survival with prostate radiation in addition to androgen deprivation therapy for men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer
AU - Rusthoven, Chad G.
AU - Jones, Bernard L.
AU - Flaig, Thomas W.
AU - Crawford, E. David
AU - Koshy, Matthew
AU - Sher, David J.
AU - Mahmood, Usama
AU - Chen, Ronald C.
AU - Chapin, Brian F.
AU - Kavanagh, Brian D.
AU - Pugh, Thomas J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/8/20
Y1 - 2016/8/20
N2 - Purpose: There is growing interest in the role of local therapies, including external beamradiotherapy (RT), formen with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa).We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of men with mPCa treated with androgen deprivation (ADT) with and without prostate RT. Methods: The NCDB was queried for men with newly diagnosed mPCa, all treated with ADT, with complete datasets for RT, surgery, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses. Results: From 2004 to 2012, 6,382menwithmPCawere identified, including 538 (8.4%) receiving prostate RT. At a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the addition of prostate RT to ADT was associated with improved OS on univariate (P<.001) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.551 to 0.706; P<.001) adjusted for age, year, race, comorbidity score, PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy administration, treating facility, and insurance status. Propensity score analysis with matched baseline characteristics demonstrated superiormedian (55 v 37months) and 5-year OS (49% v 33%) with prostate RT plus ADT compared with ADT alone (P,.001). Landmark analyses limited to long-term survivors of ≥1, ≥3, and ≥5 years demonstrated improved OS with prostate RT in all subsets (all P<.05). Secondary analyses comparing the survival outcomes for patients treated with therapeutic dose RT plus ADT versus prostatectomy plus ADT during the same time interval demonstrated no significant differences in OS, whereas both therapies were superior to ADT alone. Conclusion: In this large contemporary analysis, menwithmPCa receiving prostate RT and ADT lived substantially longer than men treated with ADT alone. Prospective trials evaluating local therapies for mPCa are warranted.
AB - Purpose: There is growing interest in the role of local therapies, including external beamradiotherapy (RT), formen with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa).We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of men with mPCa treated with androgen deprivation (ADT) with and without prostate RT. Methods: The NCDB was queried for men with newly diagnosed mPCa, all treated with ADT, with complete datasets for RT, surgery, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, Cox proportional hazards models, and propensity score-matched analyses. Results: From 2004 to 2012, 6,382menwithmPCawere identified, including 538 (8.4%) receiving prostate RT. At a median follow-up of 5.1 years, the addition of prostate RT to ADT was associated with improved OS on univariate (P<.001) and multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.624; 95% CI, 0.551 to 0.706; P<.001) adjusted for age, year, race, comorbidity score, PSA level, Gleason score, T stage, N stage, chemotherapy administration, treating facility, and insurance status. Propensity score analysis with matched baseline characteristics demonstrated superiormedian (55 v 37months) and 5-year OS (49% v 33%) with prostate RT plus ADT compared with ADT alone (P,.001). Landmark analyses limited to long-term survivors of ≥1, ≥3, and ≥5 years demonstrated improved OS with prostate RT in all subsets (all P<.05). Secondary analyses comparing the survival outcomes for patients treated with therapeutic dose RT plus ADT versus prostatectomy plus ADT during the same time interval demonstrated no significant differences in OS, whereas both therapies were superior to ADT alone. Conclusion: In this large contemporary analysis, menwithmPCa receiving prostate RT and ADT lived substantially longer than men treated with ADT alone. Prospective trials evaluating local therapies for mPCa are warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982085654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982085654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4788
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.4788
M3 - Article
C2 - 27325855
AN - SCOPUS:84982085654
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 34
SP - 2835
EP - 2842
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 24
ER -