Implementation of Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermatology in VA

Sara B. Peracca, Olevie Lachica, Rebecca P. Lamkin, George L. Jackson, David C. Mohr, Heather A. King, John D. Whited, Allene S. Fonseca, Isis J. Morris, Allen L. Gifford, Martin A. Weinstock, Dennis H. Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Innovative technology can enhance patient access to healthcare but must be successfully implemented to be effective. Objective: We evaluated Department of Veterans Affairs’ (VA’s) implementation of My VA Images, a direct-to-patient asynchronous teledermatology mobile application enabling established dermatology patients to receive follow-up care remotely instead of in-person. Design /Participants/Approach: Following pilot testing at 3 facilities, the app was introduced to 28 facilities (4 groups of 7) every 3 months using a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. Using the Organizational Theory of Implementation Effectiveness, we examined the app’s implementation using qualitative and quantitative data consisting of encounter data from VA’s corporate data warehouse; app usage from VA’s Mobile Health database; bi-monthly reports from facility representatives; phone interviews with clinicians; and documented communications between the operational partner and facility staff. Key Results: Implementation policies and practices included VA’s vision to expand home telehealth and marketing/communication strategies. The COVID-19 pandemic dominated the implementation climate by stressing staffing, introducing competing demands, and influencing stakeholder attitudes to the app, including its fit to their values. These factors were associated with mixed implementation effectiveness, defined as high quality consistent use. Nineteen of 31 exposed facilities prepared to use the app; 10 facilities used it for actual patient care, 7 as originally intended. Residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were more likely than attendings to use the app. Facilities exposed to the app pre-pandemic were more likely to use and sustain the new process. Conclusions: Considerable heterogeneity existed in implementing mobile teledermatology, despite VA’s common mission, integrated healthcare system, and stakeholders’ broad interest. Identifying opportunities to target favorable facilities and user groups (such as teaching facilities and physician extenders, respectively) while addressing internal implementation barriers including incomplete integration with the electronic health record as well as inadequate staffing may help optimize the initial impact of direct-to-patient telehealth. The COVID pandemic was a notable extrinsic barrier. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03241589.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-105
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of general internal medicine
Volume39
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024

Keywords

  • asynchronous care
  • dermatology
  • direct-to-consumer teledermatology
  • implementation science
  • mobile teledermatology
  • telemedicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementation of Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermatology in VA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this