TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of disease progression on individual IPSS trajectories and consequences of immediate versus delayed start of treatment in patients with moderate or severe LUTS associated with BPH
AU - D’Agate, Salvatore
AU - Wilson, Timothy
AU - Adalig, Burkay
AU - Manyak, Michael
AU - Palacios-Moreno, Juan Manuel
AU - Chavan, Chandrashekhar
AU - Oelke, Matthias
AU - Roehrborn, Claus
AU - Della Pasqua, Oscar
N1 - Funding Information:
Medical writing support was provided by Lisa Auker, PhD of Fishawack Indicia Ltd, UK, and funded by GSK in accordance with Good Publication Practice (GPP3) guidelines (http://www.ismpp.org/gpp3).
Funding Information:
Funding This investigation was funded by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Anonymised individual participant data and study documents can be requested for further research from www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Funding Information:
Acknowledgements Medical writing support was provided by Lisa
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/2/1
Y1 - 2020/2/1
N2 - Purpose: Despite superiority of tamsulosin–dutasteride combination therapy versus monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), patients at risk of disease progression are often initiated on α-blockers. This study evaluated the impact of initiating tamsulosin monotherapy prior to switching to tamsulosin–dutasteride combination therapy versus immediate combination therapy using a longitudinal model describing International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) trajectories in moderate/severe LUTS/BPH patients at risk of disease progression. Methods: Clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed using data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials. The effect of varying disease progression rates was explored by comparing profiles on- and off-treatment. CTS scenarios were investigated, including a reference (immediate combination therapy) and six alternative virtual treatment arms (delayed combination therapy of 1–24 months). Clinical response (≥ 25% IPSS reduction relative to baseline) was analysed using log-rank test. Differences in IPSS relative to baseline at various on-treatment time points were assessed by t tests. Results: Delayed combination therapy initiation led to significant (p < 0.01) decreases in clinical response. At month 48, clinical response rate was 79.7% versus 74.1%, 70.3% and 71.0% and IPSS was 6.3 versus 7.6, 8.1 and 8.0 (switchers from tamsulosin monotherapy after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively) with immediate combination therapy. More patients transitioned from severe/moderate to mild severity scores by month 48. Conclusions: CTS allows systematic evaluation of immediate versus delayed combination therapy. Immediate response to α-blockers is not predictive of long-term symptom improvement. Observed IPSS differences between immediate and delayed combination therapy (6–24 months) are statistically significant.
AB - Purpose: Despite superiority of tamsulosin–dutasteride combination therapy versus monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH), patients at risk of disease progression are often initiated on α-blockers. This study evaluated the impact of initiating tamsulosin monotherapy prior to switching to tamsulosin–dutasteride combination therapy versus immediate combination therapy using a longitudinal model describing International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) trajectories in moderate/severe LUTS/BPH patients at risk of disease progression. Methods: Clinical trial simulations (CTS) were performed using data from 10,238 patients from Phase III/IV dutasteride trials. The effect of varying disease progression rates was explored by comparing profiles on- and off-treatment. CTS scenarios were investigated, including a reference (immediate combination therapy) and six alternative virtual treatment arms (delayed combination therapy of 1–24 months). Clinical response (≥ 25% IPSS reduction relative to baseline) was analysed using log-rank test. Differences in IPSS relative to baseline at various on-treatment time points were assessed by t tests. Results: Delayed combination therapy initiation led to significant (p < 0.01) decreases in clinical response. At month 48, clinical response rate was 79.7% versus 74.1%, 70.3% and 71.0% and IPSS was 6.3 versus 7.6, 8.1 and 8.0 (switchers from tamsulosin monotherapy after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively) with immediate combination therapy. More patients transitioned from severe/moderate to mild severity scores by month 48. Conclusions: CTS allows systematic evaluation of immediate versus delayed combination therapy. Immediate response to α-blockers is not predictive of long-term symptom improvement. Observed IPSS differences between immediate and delayed combination therapy (6–24 months) are statistically significant.
KW - Benign prostatic hyperplasia
KW - Clinical trial simulation
KW - Drug–disease modelling
KW - Dutasteride
KW - Lower urinary tract symptoms
KW - Tamsulosin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065721198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065721198&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-019-02783-x
DO - 10.1007/s00345-019-02783-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 31079189
AN - SCOPUS:85065721198
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 38
SP - 463
EP - 472
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 2
ER -