TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy
AU - Magrath, Melissa
AU - Yang, Edward
AU - Ahn, Chul
AU - Mayorga, Christian A.
AU - Gopal, Purva
AU - Murphy, Caitlin Claffey
AU - Gupta, Samir
AU - Agrawal, Deepak
AU - Halm, Ethan A.
AU - Borton, Eric K.
AU - Skinner, Celette S
AU - Singal, Amit
N1 - Funding Information:
NIH/NCI (P30 CA142543). Research reported in this publication was also supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH (UL1TR001105). Dr. Halm was supported in part by the AHRQ Center for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (R24 HS022418). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or AHRQ. Author contributions: Study concept and design: Gupta, Halm, Skinner, Singal. Data acquisition: Magrath, Yang, Singal. Data analysis: Ahn, Borton, Singal. Data interpretation: Ahn, Mayorga, Gopal, Murphy, Agrawal, Halm, Borton, Skinner, Singal. Manuscript preparation: Magrath, Yang, Singal. Critical revision: Ahn, Mayorga, Gopal, Murphy, Gupta, Agrawal, Halm, Borton, Skinner, Singal. Funding: Halm, Skinner. Guarantor: Singal. Correspondence: Amit G. Singal, MD, MS, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5959 Harry Hines Boulevard, PO Box 1, Suite 420, Dallas, TX 75390-8887. Email: amit.singal@utsouthwestern.edu
Publisher Copyright:
© National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc.
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Background: Surveillance colonoscopy is required in patients with polyps due to an elevated colorectal cancer (CRC) risk; however, studies suggest substantial overuse and underuse of surveillance colonoscopy. The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy at a safety-net healthcare system before (n=1,822) and after (n=1,320) implementation of CoRS in December 2013. Recommendations were classified as guideline-adherent or nonadherent according to the US Multi-Society Task Force on CRC. We defined surveillance recommendations shorter and longer than guideline recommendations as potential overuse and underuse, respectively. We used multivariable generalized linear mixed models to identify correlates of guideline-adherent recommendations. Results: The proportion of guideline-adherent surveillance recommendations was significantly higher post-CoRS than pre-CoRS (84.6% vs 77.4%; P<.001), with fewer recommendations for potential overuse and underuse. In the post-CoRS period, CoRS was used for 89.8% of cases and, compared with cases for which it was not used, was associated with a higher proportion of guideline-adherent recommendations (87.0% vs 63.4%; RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23-1.42). In multivariable analysis, surveillance recommendations were also more likely to be guideline-adherent in patients with adenomas but less likely among those with fair bowel preparation and those with family history of CRC. Of 203 nonadherent recommendations, 70.4% were considered potential overuse, 20.2% potential underuse, and 9.4% were not provided surveillance recommendations. Conclusions: An EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
AB - Background: Surveillance colonoscopy is required in patients with polyps due to an elevated colorectal cancer (CRC) risk; however, studies suggest substantial overuse and underuse of surveillance colonoscopy. The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent colonoscopy with polypectomy at a safety-net healthcare system before (n=1,822) and after (n=1,320) implementation of CoRS in December 2013. Recommendations were classified as guideline-adherent or nonadherent according to the US Multi-Society Task Force on CRC. We defined surveillance recommendations shorter and longer than guideline recommendations as potential overuse and underuse, respectively. We used multivariable generalized linear mixed models to identify correlates of guideline-adherent recommendations. Results: The proportion of guideline-adherent surveillance recommendations was significantly higher post-CoRS than pre-CoRS (84.6% vs 77.4%; P<.001), with fewer recommendations for potential overuse and underuse. In the post-CoRS period, CoRS was used for 89.8% of cases and, compared with cases for which it was not used, was associated with a higher proportion of guideline-adherent recommendations (87.0% vs 63.4%; RR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.23-1.42). In multivariable analysis, surveillance recommendations were also more likely to be guideline-adherent in patients with adenomas but less likely among those with fair bowel preparation and those with family history of CRC. Of 203 nonadherent recommendations, 70.4% were considered potential overuse, 20.2% potential underuse, and 9.4% were not provided surveillance recommendations. Conclusions: An EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056628732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056628732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050
DO - 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050
M3 - Article
C2 - 30442733
AN - SCOPUS:85056628732
SN - 1540-1405
VL - 16
SP - 1321
EP - 1328
JO - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
JF - Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN
IS - 11
ER -