TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for the performance of minimally invasive splenectomy
AU - Kindel, Tammy L.
AU - Dirks, Rebecca C.
AU - Collings, Amelia T.
AU - Scholz, Stefan
AU - Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
AU - Alli, Vamsi V.
AU - Ansari, Mohammed T.
AU - Awad, Ziad
AU - Broucek, Joseph
AU - Campbell, Andre
AU - Cripps, Michael W.
AU - Hollands, Celeste
AU - Lim, Robert
AU - Quinteros, Francisco
AU - Ritchey, Kim
AU - Whiteside, Jake
AU - Zagol, Bradley
AU - Pryor, Aurora D.
AU - Walsh, Danielle
AU - Haggerty, Stephen
AU - Stefanidis, Dimitrios
N1 - Funding Information:
All committee members and voting members of the guideline panel were volunteers and did not receive funding. Funding for the methodologists, the librarian, and partial salary support for the fellow were provided by SAGES. There was no monetary or other support from industry. All guideline panel members were required to fill out a conflict-of-interest form. The guideline lead and committee chair evaluated these declarations for any pertinent conflicts. All disclosed potential conflicts of interest are listed in Supplementary Material Appendix B.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Background: Minimally invasive splenectomy (MIS) is increasingly favored for the treatment of benign and malignant diseases of the spleen over open access approaches. While many studies cite the superiority of MIS in terms of decreased morbidity and length of stay over a traditional open approach, the comparative effectiveness of specific technical and peri-operative approaches to MIS is unclear. Objective: To develop evidence-based guidelines that support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions on the peri-operative performance of MIS. Methods: A guidelines committee panel of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) including methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to grade the certainty of evidence and formulate recommendations. Results: Informed by a systematic review of the evidence, the panel agreed on eight recommendations for the peri-operative performance of MIS for adults and children in elective situations addressing six key questions. Conclusions: Conditional recommendations were made in favor of lateral positioning for non-hematologic disease, intra-operative platelet administration for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura instead of preoperative administration, and the use of mechanical devices to control the splenic hilum. Further, a conditional recommendation was made against routine intra-operative drain placement.
AB - Background: Minimally invasive splenectomy (MIS) is increasingly favored for the treatment of benign and malignant diseases of the spleen over open access approaches. While many studies cite the superiority of MIS in terms of decreased morbidity and length of stay over a traditional open approach, the comparative effectiveness of specific technical and peri-operative approaches to MIS is unclear. Objective: To develop evidence-based guidelines that support clinicians, patients, and others in decisions on the peri-operative performance of MIS. Methods: A guidelines committee panel of the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) including methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach to grade the certainty of evidence and formulate recommendations. Results: Informed by a systematic review of the evidence, the panel agreed on eight recommendations for the peri-operative performance of MIS for adults and children in elective situations addressing six key questions. Conclusions: Conditional recommendations were made in favor of lateral positioning for non-hematologic disease, intra-operative platelet administration for patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura instead of preoperative administration, and the use of mechanical devices to control the splenic hilum. Further, a conditional recommendation was made against routine intra-operative drain placement.
KW - Clinical practice guidelines
KW - Laparoscopic splenectomy
KW - Minimally invasive splenectomy
KW - Splenic artery embolization
KW - Surgical drain
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115799170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115799170&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-021-08741-2
DO - 10.1007/s00464-021-08741-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 34580773
AN - SCOPUS:85115799170
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 35
SP - 5877
EP - 5888
JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
IS - 11
ER -