TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery
T2 - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations: A 2021 Update
AU - Stenberg, Erik
AU - dos Reis Falcão, Luiz Fernando
AU - O’Kane, Mary
AU - Liem, Ronald
AU - Pournaras, Dimitri J.
AU - Salminen, Paulina
AU - Urman, Richard D.
AU - Wadhwa, Anupama
AU - Gustafsson, Ulf O.
AU - Thorell, Anders
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/4
Y1 - 2022/4
N2 - Background: This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. Methods: A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations. Results: The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries. Conclusion: A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.
AB - Background: This is the second updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline, presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery and providing recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS® protocol. Methods: A principal literature search was performed utilizing the Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and ClinicalTrials.gov through December 2020, with particular attention paid to meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached consensus regarding recommendations. Results: The quality of evidence for many ERAS interventions remains relatively low in a bariatric setting and evidence-based practices may need to be extrapolated from other surgeries. Conclusion: A comprehensive, updated evidence-based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the ERAS® Society.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122296664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122296664&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9
DO - 10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34984504
AN - SCOPUS:85122296664
SN - 0364-2313
VL - 46
SP - 729
EP - 751
JO - World Journal of Surgery
JF - World Journal of Surgery
IS - 4
ER -