TY - JOUR
T1 - Getting on the Same Page
T2 - The Impact of Interviewer Education and Structured Interviews on Interrater Agreement in Residency Interviews
AU - Gardner, Aimee K.
AU - Costa, Paula
AU - Willis, Ross E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Association of Program Directors in Surgery
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Introduction: We explored the impact of implementing structured interviews and associated interviewer education on interrater agreement within a large academic residency program. Methods: Faculty and senior resident interviewers from a large academic residency program participated in a 3-hour structured interview course. Before and after the course, participants completed a 15-item assessment pertaining to the characteristics, logistics, and guidelines associated with structured interviews. Along with interviewer training, interview day logistics also changed from an unstructured format (no specific questions, one overall 1-9 rating scale) to a structured interview format, including incorporation of behavioral-based competency questions that would be asked of every applicant and behavioral anchored rating scales (1-10; 10 = highest). Interrater agreement was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC1) for the 2 years before and 2 years after incorporation of the structured interview format. Results: A total of 45 faculty and resident interviewers participated in the course in 2018. Participant knowledge significantly increased from an average of 36% to 79% after the course (p < 0.01). Prior to the intervention, overall interrater agreement was “poor” to “fair,” with an ICC1 of 0.51 in 2016 and 0.49 in 2017. After the structured interview intervention, overall agreement increased to the “good” level with an ICC1 of 0.71 in 2018 and 0.66 in 2019. The proportion of applicants who received interview scores with at least 2 ratings more than 2 points apart significantly decreased from 59% to 47% after the intervention (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Incorporating an interviewer educational session and a structured interview format into residency selection can help increase agreement in ratings between interviewers. However, these data suggest that ongoing refresher trainings may be needed to maintain acceptable levels of interrater agreement.
AB - Introduction: We explored the impact of implementing structured interviews and associated interviewer education on interrater agreement within a large academic residency program. Methods: Faculty and senior resident interviewers from a large academic residency program participated in a 3-hour structured interview course. Before and after the course, participants completed a 15-item assessment pertaining to the characteristics, logistics, and guidelines associated with structured interviews. Along with interviewer training, interview day logistics also changed from an unstructured format (no specific questions, one overall 1-9 rating scale) to a structured interview format, including incorporation of behavioral-based competency questions that would be asked of every applicant and behavioral anchored rating scales (1-10; 10 = highest). Interrater agreement was assessed via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC1) for the 2 years before and 2 years after incorporation of the structured interview format. Results: A total of 45 faculty and resident interviewers participated in the course in 2018. Participant knowledge significantly increased from an average of 36% to 79% after the course (p < 0.01). Prior to the intervention, overall interrater agreement was “poor” to “fair,” with an ICC1 of 0.51 in 2016 and 0.49 in 2017. After the structured interview intervention, overall agreement increased to the “good” level with an ICC1 of 0.71 in 2018 and 0.66 in 2019. The proportion of applicants who received interview scores with at least 2 ratings more than 2 points apart significantly decreased from 59% to 47% after the intervention (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Incorporating an interviewer educational session and a structured interview format into residency selection can help increase agreement in ratings between interviewers. However, these data suggest that ongoing refresher trainings may be needed to maintain acceptable levels of interrater agreement.
KW - interrater agreement
KW - interview
KW - interviewer training
KW - structured interview
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133870173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133870173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.05.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 35803882
AN - SCOPUS:85133870173
SN - 1931-7204
JO - Journal of Surgical Education
JF - Journal of Surgical Education
ER -