Five years post-DORA: Promoting best practices for research assessment

Sandra L. Schmid

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations


The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was penned 5 years ago to articulate best practices for how we communicate and judge our scientific contributions. In particular, it adamantly declared that Journal Impact Factor (JIF) should never be used as a surrogate measure of the quality of individual research contributions, or for hiring, promotion, or funding decisions. Since then, a heightened awareness of the damaging practice of using JIFs as a proxy for the quality of individual papers, and to assess an individual's or institution's accomplishments has led to changes in policy and the design and application of best practices to more accurately assess the quality and impact of our research. Herein I summarize the considerable progress made and remaining challenges that must be met to ensure a fair and meritocratic approach to research assessment and the advancement of research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2941-2944
Number of pages4
JournalMolecular biology of the cell
Issue number22
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology


Dive into the research topics of 'Five years post-DORA: Promoting best practices for research assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this