TY - JOUR
T1 - Factor Structure of the Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory (CRAI)
AU - Mills, Britain A.
AU - Caetano, Raul
AU - Rhea, Arianne E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research study was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Grant UL1TR000451 to the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - The Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory (CRAI) is a 92-item measure covering 10 domains of research self-efficacy. A known behavioral antecedent, reliable and valid measures of self-efficacy represent a potentially useful tool in the evaluation of research training program efficacy. However, few formal psychometric studies of this instrument exist. Using exploratory factor analysis, we examine the CRAI's dimensional structure in a new sample of clinical research trainees. In contrast to the multidimensional solutions reported previously, CRAI responses in the present sample were unambiguously one-dimensional (as suggested by a dominant single Eigenvalue and parallel analysis). This discrepant finding may reflect sample differences in research experience, as unlike previous studies, participants had all already obtained a professional degree. The CRAI's dimensional structure may coalesce into a smaller number of factors as research experience is acquired, and investigators should be mindful of this possibility in future studies of the instrument.
AB - The Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory (CRAI) is a 92-item measure covering 10 domains of research self-efficacy. A known behavioral antecedent, reliable and valid measures of self-efficacy represent a potentially useful tool in the evaluation of research training program efficacy. However, few formal psychometric studies of this instrument exist. Using exploratory factor analysis, we examine the CRAI's dimensional structure in a new sample of clinical research trainees. In contrast to the multidimensional solutions reported previously, CRAI responses in the present sample were unambiguously one-dimensional (as suggested by a dominant single Eigenvalue and parallel analysis). This discrepant finding may reflect sample differences in research experience, as unlike previous studies, participants had all already obtained a professional degree. The CRAI's dimensional structure may coalesce into a smaller number of factors as research experience is acquired, and investigators should be mindful of this possibility in future studies of the instrument.
KW - CTSA
KW - Clinical Research Appraisal Inventory
KW - evaluation
KW - exploratory factor analysis
KW - translational research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893575518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893575518&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0163278713500303
DO - 10.1177/0163278713500303
M3 - Article
C2 - 23960271
AN - SCOPUS:84893575518
SN - 0163-2787
VL - 37
SP - 71
EP - 82
JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions
JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions
IS - 1
ER -