TY - JOUR
T1 - Evacetrapib and Cardiovascular Outcomes in High-Risk Vascular Disease
AU - ACCELERATE Investigators
AU - Lincoff, A. Michael
AU - Nicholls, Stephen J.
AU - Riesmeyer, Jeffrey S.
AU - Barter, Philip J.
AU - Brewer, H. Bryan
AU - Fox, Keith A.A.
AU - Gibson, C. Michael
AU - Granger, Christopher
AU - Menon, Venu
AU - Montalescot, Gilles
AU - Rader, Daniel
AU - Tall, Alan R.
AU - McErlean, Ellen
AU - Wolski, Kathy
AU - Ruotolo, Giacomo
AU - Vangerow, Burkhard
AU - Weerakkody, Govinda
AU - Goodman, Shaun G.
AU - Conde, Diego
AU - McGuire, Darren K
AU - Nicolau, Jose C.
AU - Leiva-Pons, Jose L.
AU - Pesant, Yves
AU - Li, Weimin
AU - Kandath, David
AU - Kouz, Simon
AU - Tahirkheli, Naeem
AU - Mason, Denise
AU - Nissen, Steven E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funded by Eli Lilly; ACCELERATE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01687998. Supported by Eli Lilly. Dr. Lincoff reports receiving grant support, through a research contract with his institution, from Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Roche, CSL Behring, Esperion, and AbbVie; Dr. Nicholls, receiving grant support from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Cerenis, Novartis, Esperion, Resverlogix, Sanofi-Regeneron, and the Medicines Company, fees for serving on advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Novartis, Resverlogix, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Sanofi-Regeneron, and Roche, and lecture fees from Amgen and Merck; Dr. Riesmeyer, being employed by and owning stock in Eli Lilly; Dr. Barter, receiving grant support from Pfizer and Merck, fees for serving on an advisory board and lecture fees from Pfizer, Merck, and Amgen, and fees for serving on an advisory board from AstraZeneca and Sanofi-Regeneron; Dr. Brewer Jr., receiving consulting fees from Merck, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Cerenis, and DeZima Pharma; Mr. Fox, receiving grant support and honoraria from Bayer/Janssen and AstraZeneca, and honoraria from Sanofi/Regeneron; Dr. Granger, receiving grant support from Armetheon, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the Medicines Company, Medtronic Foundation, Novartis, and Pfizer, lecture fees and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, the Medicines Company, Medtronic, Novartis, Pfizer, and Verseon, and lecture fees from Bayer; Dr. Montalescot, receiving grant support, to his institution, from Association pour le D?veloppement Industriel de la R?union, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celladon, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, F?d?ration Fran?aise de Cardiologie, Medtronic, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, and the Medicines Company and consulting fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, the Medicines Company, Berlin Chimie, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, CME Resources, Europa, Elsevier, Fondazione Anna Maria Sechi per il Cuore, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Lead-Up, Menarini, TIMI Study Group, and WebMD; Mr. Tall, receiving consulting fees from Merck, CSL Behring, and MedImmune; Ms. McErlean, receiving grant support from Eli Lilly and Pfizer; Dr. Ruotolo, being employed by Eli Lilly; Dr. Vangerow, being employed by and owning equity or stock in Eli Lilly; Dr. Weerakkody, being employed by Eli Lilly; Dr. Goodman, receiving grant support, fees for serving on an advisory board, consulting fees, and lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Regeneron; Dr. McGuire, receiving fees for serving on committees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen Research and Development, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, AstraZeneca, and Eisai, consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi US, Eli Lilly, and Novo Nordisk, fees for serving on an advisory board from Merck Sharp and Dohme, and fees for serving as clinical trials chairperson from Lexicon; Dr. Nicolau, receiving grant support from Amgen, Sanofi, and Merck, fees for serving on advisory boards from Sanofi and Merck, and fees for serving on the NLI/Member Steering Committee for SPIRE from Pfizer; Dr. Kouz, receiving grant support, lecture fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Servier, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Valeant, Pfizer, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and Amgen, grant support and lecture fees from Merck, and grant support from Dalcor, Eli Lilly, Theracos, Eisai, Esperion Therapeutics, Janssen, GlaxoSmithKline, and Amarin Pharma; and Dr. Nissen, receiving grant support from Pfizer, the Medicines Company, Amgen, Cerenis, AstraZeneca, and Esperion Therapeutics. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 Massachusetts Medical Society.
PY - 2017/5/18
Y1 - 2017/5/18
N2 - BACKGROUND: The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib substantially raises the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, reduces the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level, and enhances cellular cholesterol efflux capacity. We sought to determine the effect of evacetrapib on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high-risk vascular disease. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled 12,092 patients who had at least one of the following conditions: an acute coronary syndrome within the previous 30 to 365 days, cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, peripheral vascular arterial disease, or diabetes mellitus with coronary artery disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either evacetrapib at a dose of 130 mg or matching placebo, administered daily, in addition to standard medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point was the first occurrence of any component of the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: At 3 months, a 31.1% decrease in the mean LDL cholesterol level was observed with evacetrapib versus a 6.0% increase with placebo, and a 133.2% increase in the mean HDL cholesterol level was seen with evacetrapib versus a 1.6% increase with placebo. After 1363 of the planned 1670 primary end-point events had occurred, the data and safety monitoring board recommended that the trial be terminated early because of a lack of efficacy. After a median of 26 months of evacetrapib or placebo, a primary end-point event occurred in 12.9% of the patients in the evacetrapib group and in 12.8% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.11; P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Although the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib had favorable effects on established lipid biomarkers, treatment with evacetrapib did not result in a lower rate of cardiovascular events than placebo among patients with high-risk vascular disease.
AB - BACKGROUND: The cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib substantially raises the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level, reduces the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level, and enhances cellular cholesterol efflux capacity. We sought to determine the effect of evacetrapib on major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with high-risk vascular disease. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled 12,092 patients who had at least one of the following conditions: an acute coronary syndrome within the previous 30 to 365 days, cerebrovascular atherosclerotic disease, peripheral vascular arterial disease, or diabetes mellitus with coronary artery disease. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either evacetrapib at a dose of 130 mg or matching placebo, administered daily, in addition to standard medical therapy. The primary efficacy end point was the first occurrence of any component of the composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: At 3 months, a 31.1% decrease in the mean LDL cholesterol level was observed with evacetrapib versus a 6.0% increase with placebo, and a 133.2% increase in the mean HDL cholesterol level was seen with evacetrapib versus a 1.6% increase with placebo. After 1363 of the planned 1670 primary end-point events had occurred, the data and safety monitoring board recommended that the trial be terminated early because of a lack of efficacy. After a median of 26 months of evacetrapib or placebo, a primary end-point event occurred in 12.9% of the patients in the evacetrapib group and in 12.8% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.11; P = 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Although the cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor evacetrapib had favorable effects on established lipid biomarkers, treatment with evacetrapib did not result in a lower rate of cardiovascular events than placebo among patients with high-risk vascular disease.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019790381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019790381&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1056/NEJMoa1609581
DO - 10.1056/NEJMoa1609581
M3 - Article
C2 - 28514624
AN - SCOPUS:85019790381
SN - 0028-4793
VL - 376
SP - 1933
EP - 1942
JO - New England Journal of Medicine
JF - New England Journal of Medicine
IS - 20
ER -