Endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: Intravesical versus ectopic

B. Blyth, G. Passerini-Glazel, C. Camuffo, H. M. Snyder, J. W. Duckett, T. D. Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

42 Scopus citations


A total of 51 children, mostly less than 2 years old, underwent endoscopic incision of ureteroceles as a primary form of treatment. In 73% no further surgery was required. Of the patients 19 were diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, with a urinary tract infection the usual presenting symptom in the remainder. Of 27 intravesical cases endoscopic incision resulted in decompression of the ureterocele in 93%, with preservation of upper pole function in 96%, and secondary surgical procedures were required in 7%. Reflux was created in 18% and it persisted in 2 of 4 patients. Of 24 cases of ectopic (extravesical) ureteroceles incision resulted in decompression in 75%, with upper pole function preserved in 50%. Reflux was created in 47% and a secondary surgical procedure was performed in 50%. Preservation of upper pole function was significantly better for intravesical versus ectopic ureteroceles (p <0.01), and the requirement for secondary surgical procedure was greater with ectopic ureteroceles (p <0.01). Three patients had intermittent bladder outlet obstruction following the incision and required further surgery. The 2 different techniques for incision of intravesical and ectopic ureteroceles are described. The role of endoscopic incision in the overall management of ureteroceles is confirmed by this review, and the need for partial nephroureterectomy may diminish.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)556-560
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1993


  • endoscopy
  • pediatrics
  • ureterocele

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Endoscopic incision of ureteroceles: Intravesical versus ectopic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this