TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of vitamin d supplementation on cardiovascular and glycemic biomarkers
AU - Miao, Jennifer
AU - Bachmann, Katherine N.
AU - Huang, Shi
AU - Su, Yan Ru
AU - Dusek, Jeffery
AU - Newton-Cheh, Christopher
AU - Arora, Pankaj
AU - Wang, Thomas J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The parent study was funded by an investigator-initiated grant from DiaSorin Inc. Support for some of the assays in the substudy was provided by Diasorin. Diasorin was not involved in the design or conduct of the study; the collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; or the preparation of the article for publication. This work was also supported by Career Development Award #IK2 CX001678 (Bachmann) from the US Department of Veterans Affairs Clinical Sciences Research and Development Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Faculty Research Scholars Award (Bachmann), and American Heart Association Career Development Award 18CDA34110135 (Arora).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - BACKGROUND: Experimental and observational studies have suggested a link between vitamin D and cardiovascular and metabolic disease, but this has not been confirmed in randomized controlled trials. We sought to determine whether vitamin D supplementation reduces biomarkers of insulin resistance, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, and lipids. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prespecified, secondary analysis of the DAYLIGHT (Vitamin D Therapy in Individuals at High Risk of Hypertension) randomized controlled trial. We measured circulating homeostatic model assessment of insulin resist-ance, hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, renin, aldosterone, and lipids at baseline and at 6 months in 289 individuals with low vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin-D [25-OH-D] ≤25 ng/mL) receiving low-dose (400 IU/d) versus high-dose (4000 IU/d) vitamin D3 for 6 months. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting biomarker changes after vitamin D supplementation was then performed. Levels of 25-OH-D increased in the high-dose relative to the low-dose vitamin D group (+15.5 versus +4.6 ng/mL, P<0.001). Changes in biomarkers of glycemia, inflam-mation, and neurohormonal activation did not differ by dose. Lipids did not differ between groups, other than triglycerides, which increased in the high-dose compared with the low-dose group (+11.3 versus −6.2 mg/dL, P<0.001). The meta-analysis showed potential modest decreases in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and hs-CRP, but no changes in low-density lipoprotein, after vitamin D supplementation compared with control groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the DAYLIGHT randomized controlled trial, high-dose vitamin D supplementation did not improve biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, or lipids. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01240512.
AB - BACKGROUND: Experimental and observational studies have suggested a link between vitamin D and cardiovascular and metabolic disease, but this has not been confirmed in randomized controlled trials. We sought to determine whether vitamin D supplementation reduces biomarkers of insulin resistance, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, and lipids. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prespecified, secondary analysis of the DAYLIGHT (Vitamin D Therapy in Individuals at High Risk of Hypertension) randomized controlled trial. We measured circulating homeostatic model assessment of insulin resist-ance, hs-CRP (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, renin, aldosterone, and lipids at baseline and at 6 months in 289 individuals with low vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin-D [25-OH-D] ≤25 ng/mL) receiving low-dose (400 IU/d) versus high-dose (4000 IU/d) vitamin D3 for 6 months. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials reporting biomarker changes after vitamin D supplementation was then performed. Levels of 25-OH-D increased in the high-dose relative to the low-dose vitamin D group (+15.5 versus +4.6 ng/mL, P<0.001). Changes in biomarkers of glycemia, inflam-mation, and neurohormonal activation did not differ by dose. Lipids did not differ between groups, other than triglycerides, which increased in the high-dose compared with the low-dose group (+11.3 versus −6.2 mg/dL, P<0.001). The meta-analysis showed potential modest decreases in homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance and hs-CRP, but no changes in low-density lipoprotein, after vitamin D supplementation compared with control groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the DAYLIGHT randomized controlled trial, high-dose vitamin D supplementation did not improve biomarkers of glycemia, inflammation, neurohormonal activation, or lipids. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01240512.
KW - High-sensitivity C-reactive protein
KW - Insulin resistance
KW - Lipids
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Vitamin D
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106552236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85106552236&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.120.017727
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.120.017727
M3 - Article
C2 - 33960201
AN - SCOPUS:85106552236
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 10
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 10
M1 - e017727
ER -