TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide on kidney function and safety in patients with type 2 diabetes
T2 - a post-hoc analysis of the SUSTAIN 1–7 randomised controlled trials
AU - Mann, Johannes F.E.
AU - Hansen, Thomas
AU - Idorn, Thomas
AU - Leiter, Lawrence A.
AU - Marso, Steven P.
AU - Rossing, Peter
AU - Seufert, Jochen
AU - Tadayon, Sayeh
AU - Vilsbøll, Tina
N1 - Funding Information:
The funding sources contributed to the design and conduct of the trials, the analysis and interpretation of the data, and review of the manuscript. The SUSTAIN 1–7 trials were funded by Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark. We thank all patients, investigators, and trial-site staff members who were involved in the conduct of the trials. We also thank Charlotte Hindsberger for reviewing the manuscript and Ellen Robertshaw and Flavia Sciota (AXON Communications) for medical writing and editorial assistance (funded by Novo Nordisk).
Funding Information:
JFEM received speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, B. Braun, Celgene, Fresenius Medical Care, Gambro, Medice, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Relypsa, Sandoz, ZS Pharma; and grant support from AbbVie, Celgene, the European Union and McMaster University, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz; JFEM was also a paid committee member for AbbVie, ACI Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, B. Braun, Celgene, Fresenius Medical Care, Lanthio Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Relypsa, Roche, Sandoz, Sanifit, ZS Pharma. TH was a full-time employee of Novo Nordisk for the majority of manuscript development, and is now employed by Orphazyme. TI is a Novo Nordisk employee. LAL received fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Servier for participation on advisory boards; research support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Servier. SPM received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk; speaker fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific; research support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novo Nordisk; and participated in steering committees, medical education, or clinical trial activities for Abbott, Asahi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novo Nordisk. PR received consulting or speaker fees, or both, from AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Vifor; and research support from AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk. JS received speaker fees, fees for participation on advisory boards and trial support from Novo Nordisk. ST is a Novo Nordisk employee and shareholder. TV consulted and received fees for advisory boards from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, Mundipharma, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Sun Pharma; and received grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Lilly, and Novo Nordisk.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes have a high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. We examined the effects of semaglutide on kidney function and safety in a large, broad type 2 diabetes population. Methods: We did a post-hoc analysis of 8416 patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7 randomised controlled trials, and the SUSTAIN 6 cardiovascular outcomes trial, to examine the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0·5 mg and 1·0 mg versus comparators (active treatments or placebo) on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and kidney adverse events. Data from SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7 were pooled. eGFR and UACR were also analysed by kidney function and albuminuria status. Findings: In SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7, eGFR decreased from baseline to week 12 with all active treatments; estimated treatment differences (ETDs) versus placebo were −2·15 (95% CI −3·47 to −0·83) mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and −3·00 (−4·31 to −1·68) mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg; after week 12, eGFR plateaued. In SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7, from baseline to end of treatment the decline in eGFR was greater with semaglutide than with placebo (ETD −1·58 [95% CI −2·92 to −0·25] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and −2·02 [–3·35 to −0·68] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 6, the decline in eGFR was greater with semaglutide than with placebo from baseline to week 16 (ETD −1·29 [95% CI −2·07 to −0·51] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and −1·56 [–2·33 to −0·78] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg), but not from week 16 to week 104 (1·29 [0·30 to 2·28] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and 2·44 [1·45 to 3·44] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg). Overall (ie, from baseline to week 104), the eGFR decline in SUSTAIN 6 was similar between semaglutide and placebo (ETD 0·07 [95% CI −0·92 to 1·07] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and 0·97 [–0·03 to 1·97] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 1–5, UACR ratios at end of treatment to baseline were 0·917 with semaglutide 0·5 mg, 0·836 with semaglutide 1·0 mg, and 1·239 with placebo; at end of treatment, greater reductions in UACR were observed with semaglutide versus placebo (estimated treatment ratios 0·74 [95% CI 0·64 to 0·85] for semaglutide 0·5 mg and 0·68 [0·59 to 0·78] for semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 6, UACR ratios at end of treatment (week 104) to baseline were 0·973 with semaglutide 0·5 mg, 0·858 with semaglutide 1·0 mg, and 1·302 with placebo; at week 104, greater reductions in UACR were observed with semaglutide versus placebo (estimated treatment ratios 0·75 [95% CI 0·66 to 0·85] for semaglutide 0·5 mg and 0·66 [0·58 to 0·75] for semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 1–7, eGFR initially declined in patients with normal kidney function (and in those with mild kidney impairment with semaglutide 1·0 mg in SUSTAIN 6), but overall (ie, by week 30 for SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7, and week 104 for SUSTAIN 6), eGFR did not differ between semaglutide and placebo. In SUSTAIN 1–6, UACR decreased in patients with pre-existing microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria at baseline; it did not change or increased in those with normoalbuminuria at baseline. Kidney adverse events were balanced between treatment groups. Interpretation: Across the SUSTAIN 1–7 trials, semaglutide was associated with initial reductions in eGFR that plateaued, and marked reductions in UACR. This post-hoc analysis suggests no increase in the risk of kidney adverse events with semaglutide versus the active comparators used across SUSTAIN 1–7. Funding: Novo Nordisk.
AB - Background: Patients with type 2 diabetes have a high risk of developing chronic kidney disease. We examined the effects of semaglutide on kidney function and safety in a large, broad type 2 diabetes population. Methods: We did a post-hoc analysis of 8416 patients with type 2 diabetes enrolled in the SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7 randomised controlled trials, and the SUSTAIN 6 cardiovascular outcomes trial, to examine the effects of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0·5 mg and 1·0 mg versus comparators (active treatments or placebo) on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), and kidney adverse events. Data from SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7 were pooled. eGFR and UACR were also analysed by kidney function and albuminuria status. Findings: In SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7, eGFR decreased from baseline to week 12 with all active treatments; estimated treatment differences (ETDs) versus placebo were −2·15 (95% CI −3·47 to −0·83) mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and −3·00 (−4·31 to −1·68) mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg; after week 12, eGFR plateaued. In SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7, from baseline to end of treatment the decline in eGFR was greater with semaglutide than with placebo (ETD −1·58 [95% CI −2·92 to −0·25] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and −2·02 [–3·35 to −0·68] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 6, the decline in eGFR was greater with semaglutide than with placebo from baseline to week 16 (ETD −1·29 [95% CI −2·07 to −0·51] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and −1·56 [–2·33 to −0·78] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg), but not from week 16 to week 104 (1·29 [0·30 to 2·28] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and 2·44 [1·45 to 3·44] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg). Overall (ie, from baseline to week 104), the eGFR decline in SUSTAIN 6 was similar between semaglutide and placebo (ETD 0·07 [95% CI −0·92 to 1·07] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 0·5 mg and 0·97 [–0·03 to 1·97] mL/min per 1·73 m2 with semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 1–5, UACR ratios at end of treatment to baseline were 0·917 with semaglutide 0·5 mg, 0·836 with semaglutide 1·0 mg, and 1·239 with placebo; at end of treatment, greater reductions in UACR were observed with semaglutide versus placebo (estimated treatment ratios 0·74 [95% CI 0·64 to 0·85] for semaglutide 0·5 mg and 0·68 [0·59 to 0·78] for semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 6, UACR ratios at end of treatment (week 104) to baseline were 0·973 with semaglutide 0·5 mg, 0·858 with semaglutide 1·0 mg, and 1·302 with placebo; at week 104, greater reductions in UACR were observed with semaglutide versus placebo (estimated treatment ratios 0·75 [95% CI 0·66 to 0·85] for semaglutide 0·5 mg and 0·66 [0·58 to 0·75] for semaglutide 1·0 mg). In SUSTAIN 1–7, eGFR initially declined in patients with normal kidney function (and in those with mild kidney impairment with semaglutide 1·0 mg in SUSTAIN 6), but overall (ie, by week 30 for SUSTAIN 1–5 and SUSTAIN 7, and week 104 for SUSTAIN 6), eGFR did not differ between semaglutide and placebo. In SUSTAIN 1–6, UACR decreased in patients with pre-existing microalbuminuria or macroalbuminuria at baseline; it did not change or increased in those with normoalbuminuria at baseline. Kidney adverse events were balanced between treatment groups. Interpretation: Across the SUSTAIN 1–7 trials, semaglutide was associated with initial reductions in eGFR that plateaued, and marked reductions in UACR. This post-hoc analysis suggests no increase in the risk of kidney adverse events with semaglutide versus the active comparators used across SUSTAIN 1–7. Funding: Novo Nordisk.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092232206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092232206&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30313-2
DO - 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30313-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 32971040
AN - SCOPUS:85092232206
SN - 2213-8587
VL - 8
SP - 880
EP - 893
JO - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
JF - The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
IS - 11
ER -