Effect of structured interviews on evaluation time in pediatric community mental health settings

Carroll W. Hughes, Graham J. Emslie, Hazel Wohlfahrt, Regena Winslow, T. Michael Kashner, A. John Rush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations


Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a structured interview administered by a master's-level clinician and reported to physicians before an initial evaluation would reduce physicians' evaluation time without compromising diagnostic accuracy or clinical outcomes in a pediatric sample. Methods: A sample of 225 children and adolescents who were seen in public-sector community facilities was randomly assigned either to receive a structured interview (the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-aged Children-Present and Lifetime Versions) by a trained interviewer before the initial physician visit or to receive assessment as usual. Clinical outcome data were collected prospectively, with follow-up at four months. Results: Physicians' evaluation time was reduced by approximately half among physicians who were given preliminary diagnostic information. Physicians' diagnoses were strongly related to the results of the structured interview. Physicians' having access to previously obtained diagnostic information was associated with better psychosocial functioning at follow-up in terms of peer relations and spare-time activities compared with assessment as usual. Conclusions: Adding a trained diagnostic interviewer to the clinical team could reduce physicians' initial diagnostic evaluation time and improve diagnostic reliability and psychosocial outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1098-1103
Number of pages6
JournalPsychiatric Services
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health


Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of structured interviews on evaluation time in pediatric community mental health settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this