Effect of KRAS oncogene substitutions on protein behavior: Implications for signaling and clinical outcome

Nathan T. Ihle, Lauren A. Byers, Edward S. Kim, Pierre Saintigny, J. Jack Lee, George R. Blumenschein, Anne Tsao, Suyu Liu, Jill E. Larsen, Jing Wang, Lixia Diao, Kevin R. Coombes, Lu Chen, Shuxing Zhang, Mena F. Abdelmelek, Ximing Tang, Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou, John D. Minna, Scott M. Lippman, Waun K. HongRoy S. Herbst, Ignacio I. Wistuba, John V. Heymach, Garth Powis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

388 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Mutations in the v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) play a critical role in cancer cell growth and resistance to therapy. Most mutations occur at codons 12 and 13. In colorectal cancer, the presence of any mutant KRas amino acid substitution is a negative predictor of patient response to targeted therapy. However, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the evidence that KRAS mutation is a predictive factor is conflicting. Methods We used data from a molecularly targeted clinical trial for 215 patients with tissues available out of 268 evaluable patients with refractory NSCLC to examine associations between specific mutant KRas proteins and progression-free survival and tumor gene expression. Transcriptome microarray studies of patient tumor samples and reverse-phase protein array studies of a panel of 67 NSCLC cell lines with known substitutions in KRas and in immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells stably expressing different mutant KRas proteins were used to investigate signaling pathway activation. Molecular modeling was used to study the conformations of wild-type and mutant KRas proteins. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression were used to analyze survival data. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Patients whose tumors had either mutant KRas-Gly12Cys or mutant KRas-Gly12Val had worse progression-free survival compared with patients whose tumors had other mutant KRas proteins or wild-type KRas (P =. 046, median survival = 1.84 months) compared with all other mutant KRas (median survival = 3.35 months) or wild-type KRas (median survival = 1.95 months). NSCLC cell lines with mutant KRas-Gly12Asp had activated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI-3-K) and mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) signaling, whereas those with mutant KRas-Gly12Cys or mutant KRas-Gly12Val had activated Ral signaling and decreased growth factor-dependent Akt activation. Molecular modeling studies showed that different conformations imposed by mutant KRas may lead to altered association with downstream signaling transducers. Conclusions Not all mutant KRas proteins affect patient survival or downstream signaling in a similar way. The heterogeneous behavior of mutant KRas proteins implies that therapeutic interventions may need to take into account the specific mutant KRas expressed by the tumor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)228-239
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 8 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of KRAS oncogene substitutions on protein behavior: Implications for signaling and clinical outcome'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this