Effect of Application Screening Methods on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Otolaryngology

Christina Dorismond, Zainab Farzal, Rupali N. Shah, Charles S. Ebert, Robert A. Buckmire

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) lags behind other surgical subspecialties in the representation of underrepresented minorities in medicine (URMs). Given the recently announced changes to Step 1 scoring, we aimed to assess the effect of alternative application screening methods—Step 2 Clinical Knowledge scores and Alpha Omega Alpha membership—on the racial/ethnic diversity of the OHNS applicant pool. After reviewing OHNS residency applications submitted to our institution for the 2015-2020 matches (N = 2177), we determined that a significantly greater proportion of URM vs non-URM applicants would be screened out from interview consideration if any the following were used as an initial screening method: Step 2 cutoff score of 240, Step 2 cutoff score of 253 or non–Alpha Omega Alpha membership (P <.01 for each). Given that using these metrics to screen applications disproportionately affects URMs, programs should consider implementing alternative application review methods, such as holistic evaluation, which may promote more equitable distribution of interviews.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1166-1168
Number of pages3
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)
Volume166
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • applications
  • medical student
  • otolaryngology
  • residency
  • underrepresented minorities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of Application Screening Methods on Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Otolaryngology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this