TY - JOUR
T1 - Drugs for preventing red blood cell dehydration in people with sickle cell disease
AU - Nagalla, Srikanth
AU - Ballas, Samir K.
N1 - Funding Information:
Relevant studies were identified from the Cystic Fibrosis & Genetic Disorders Review Group’s Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register using the terms: (sickle cell OR (haemoglobinopathies AND general)) [kw] AND (dehydration [kw,ti,ab] OR (anti-sickling OR crisis) [kw]) The Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register is compiled from electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (updated each new issue of the Cochrane Library) and weekly searches of MEDLINE. Unpublished work is identified by searching the abstract books of five major conferences: the European Haematology Association conference; the American Society of Hematology conference; the British Society for Haematology Annual Scientific Meeting; the Caribbean Public Health Agency Annual Scientific Meeting (formerly the Caribbean Health Research Council Meeting); and the National Sickle Cell Disease Program Annual Meeting. For full details of all searching activities for the register, please see the relevant section of the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group’s website. Date of the most recent search of the Group’s Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 08 October 2018. We also searched the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ( ICTRP) ( apps.who.int/ trialsearch/) and ClinicalTrials.gov ( www.ClinicalTrials.gov) for any ongoing trials (01 July 2018) (Appendix 1).
Funding Information:
• National Institute for Health Research, UK. This systematic review was supported by the National Institute for Health Research, via Cochrane Infrastructure funding to the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 The Cochrane Collaboration.
PY - 2018/10/19
Y1 - 2018/10/19
N2 - Background: Sickle cell disease is an inherited disorder of hemoglobin, resulting in abnormal red blood cells. These are rigid and may block blood vessels leading to acute painful crises and other complications. Recent research has focused on therapies to rehydrate the sickled cells by reducing the loss of water and ions from them. Little is known about the effectiveness and safety of such drugs. This is an updated version of a previously published review. Objectives: To assess the relative risks and benefits of drugs to rehydrate sickled red blood cells. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register. We also searched online trials registries for any ongoing trials (01 July 2018). Last search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 08 October 2018. Selection criteria: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of drugs to rehydrate sickled red blood cells compared to placebo or an alternative treatment. Data collection and analysis: Both authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data. Main results: Of the 51 studies identified, three met the inclusion criteria, including 524 people with sickle cell disease aged between 12 and 65 years of age. One study tested the effectiveness of zinc sulphate as compared to placebo and the remaining two assessed senicapoc versus placebo. No deaths were seen in any of the studies (low-quality evidence). The zinc sulphate study showed a significant reduction in painful crises (in a total of 145 participants) over one and a half years, mean difference -2.83 (95% confidence interval -3.51 to -2.15) (moderate-quality evidence). However, analysis was restricted due to limited statistical data. Changes to red blood cell parameters and blood counts were inconsistent (very low-quality evidence). No serious adverse events were noted in the study. The Phase II dose-finding study of senicapoc (a Gardos channel blocker) compared to placebo showed that the high dose senicapoc showed significant improvement in change in hemoglobin level, the number and proportion of dense red blood cells, red blood cell count and indices and hematocrit value (very low-quality evidence). The results with low-dose senicapoc were similar to the high-dose senicapoc group but of lesser magnitude. There was no difference in the frequency of painful crises between the three groups (low-quality evidence). A subsequent Phase III study of senicapoc was terminated early since there was no difference observed between the treatment and control groups in the primary end point of painful crises. Authors' conclusions: While the results of zinc for reducing sickle-related crises are encouraging, larger and longer-term multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this therapy for people with sickle cell disease. While the Phase II and the prematurely terminated phase III studies of senicapoc showed that the drug improved red blood cell survival (depending on dose), this did not lead to fewer painful crises. Given this is no longer an active area of research, this review will no longer be regularly updated.
AB - Background: Sickle cell disease is an inherited disorder of hemoglobin, resulting in abnormal red blood cells. These are rigid and may block blood vessels leading to acute painful crises and other complications. Recent research has focused on therapies to rehydrate the sickled cells by reducing the loss of water and ions from them. Little is known about the effectiveness and safety of such drugs. This is an updated version of a previously published review. Objectives: To assess the relative risks and benefits of drugs to rehydrate sickled red blood cells. Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register. We also searched online trials registries for any ongoing trials (01 July 2018). Last search of the Group's Haemoglobinopathies Trials Register: 08 October 2018. Selection criteria: Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials of drugs to rehydrate sickled red blood cells compared to placebo or an alternative treatment. Data collection and analysis: Both authors independently selected studies for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data. Main results: Of the 51 studies identified, three met the inclusion criteria, including 524 people with sickle cell disease aged between 12 and 65 years of age. One study tested the effectiveness of zinc sulphate as compared to placebo and the remaining two assessed senicapoc versus placebo. No deaths were seen in any of the studies (low-quality evidence). The zinc sulphate study showed a significant reduction in painful crises (in a total of 145 participants) over one and a half years, mean difference -2.83 (95% confidence interval -3.51 to -2.15) (moderate-quality evidence). However, analysis was restricted due to limited statistical data. Changes to red blood cell parameters and blood counts were inconsistent (very low-quality evidence). No serious adverse events were noted in the study. The Phase II dose-finding study of senicapoc (a Gardos channel blocker) compared to placebo showed that the high dose senicapoc showed significant improvement in change in hemoglobin level, the number and proportion of dense red blood cells, red blood cell count and indices and hematocrit value (very low-quality evidence). The results with low-dose senicapoc were similar to the high-dose senicapoc group but of lesser magnitude. There was no difference in the frequency of painful crises between the three groups (low-quality evidence). A subsequent Phase III study of senicapoc was terminated early since there was no difference observed between the treatment and control groups in the primary end point of painful crises. Authors' conclusions: While the results of zinc for reducing sickle-related crises are encouraging, larger and longer-term multicenter studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this therapy for people with sickle cell disease. While the Phase II and the prematurely terminated phase III studies of senicapoc showed that the drug improved red blood cell survival (depending on dose), this did not lead to fewer painful crises. Given this is no longer an active area of research, this review will no longer be regularly updated.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055633763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055633763&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/14651858.CD003426.pub6
DO - 10.1002/14651858.CD003426.pub6
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30338520
AN - SCOPUS:85055633763
SN - 1465-1858
VL - 2018
JO - The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
JF - The Cochrane database of systematic reviews
IS - 10
M1 - CD003426
ER -