TY - JOUR
T1 - Don’t mess with the pancreas! A multicenter analysis of the management of low-grade pancreatic injuries
AU - the WTA Multicenter Trials Group on Pancreatic Injuries
AU - Biffl, Walter L.
AU - Ball, Chad G.
AU - Moore, Ernest E.
AU - Lees, Jason
AU - Todd, S. Rob
AU - Wydo, Salina
AU - Privette, Alicia
AU - Weaver, Jessica L.
AU - Koenig, Samantha M.
AU - Meagher, Ashley
AU - Dultz, Linda
AU - Udekwu, Pascal
AU - Harrell, Kevin
AU - Chen, Allen K.
AU - Callcut, Rachael
AU - Kornblith, Lucy
AU - Jurkovich, Gregory J.
AU - Castelo, Matthew
AU - Schaffer, Kathryn B.
AU - Alam, Hasan
AU - Balogh, Zsolt
AU - Bansal, Vishal
AU - Barmparas, Galinos
AU - Benbenisty, Julie
AU - Bhattacharya, Bishwajit
AU - Bower, Katie
AU - Burlew, Clay
AU - Burton, Josh
AU - Chestovich, Paul
AU - Clements, Thomas
AU - Cullinane, Daniel
AU - Curran, Barb
AU - Davis, James
AU - Decker, Cassie
AU - Dirks, Rachel
AU - Douglas, Anthony
AU - Grimes, Arthur
AU - Flores, Carmen
AU - Koganti, Deepika
AU - Kulenschmidt, Kali
AU - Landis, Ryan
AU - Limney-Lasso, Erika
AU - Laughlin, Michelle
AU - Leon, Stuart
AU - Margulies, Daniel
AU - Maxwell, Robert
AU - Morone, Emma
AU - Pascual, Jose
AU - Peck, Kim
AU - Podbielski, Jeanette
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend nonoperative management (NOM) of low-grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale Grade I–II) pancreatic injuries (LGPIs), and drainage rather than resection for those undergoing operative management, but they are based on low-quality evidence. The purpose of this study was to review the contemporary management and outcomes of LGPIs and identify risk factors for morbidity. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective review of diagnosis, management, and outcomes of adult pancreatic injuries from 2010 to 2018. The primary outcome was pancreas-related complications (PRCs). Predictors of PRCs were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-nine centers submitted data on 728 patients with LGPI (76% men; mean age, 38 years; 37% penetrating; 51% Grade I; median Injury Severity Score, 24). Among 24-hour survivors, definitive management was NOM in 31%, surgical drainage alone in 54%, resection in 10%, and pancreatic debridement or suturing in 5%. The incidence of PRCs was 21% overall and was 42% after resection, 26% after drainage, and 4% after NOM. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for PRC were other intra-abdominal injury (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.16–15.28), low volume (OR, 2.88; 1.65, 5.06), and penetrating injury (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.80–6.58). Resection was very close to significance (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.97–4.34) (p = 0.0584). CONCLUSION: The incidence of PRCs is significant after LGPIs. Patients who undergo pancreatic resection have PRC rates equivalent to patients resected for high-grade pancreatic injuries. Those who underwent surgical drainage had slightly lower PRC rate, but only 4% of those who underwent NOM had PRCs. In patients with LGPIs, resection should be avoided. The NOM strategy should be used whenever possible and studied prospectively, particularly in penetrating trauma.
AB - INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend nonoperative management (NOM) of low-grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale Grade I–II) pancreatic injuries (LGPIs), and drainage rather than resection for those undergoing operative management, but they are based on low-quality evidence. The purpose of this study was to review the contemporary management and outcomes of LGPIs and identify risk factors for morbidity. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective review of diagnosis, management, and outcomes of adult pancreatic injuries from 2010 to 2018. The primary outcome was pancreas-related complications (PRCs). Predictors of PRCs were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Twenty-nine centers submitted data on 728 patients with LGPI (76% men; mean age, 38 years; 37% penetrating; 51% Grade I; median Injury Severity Score, 24). Among 24-hour survivors, definitive management was NOM in 31%, surgical drainage alone in 54%, resection in 10%, and pancreatic debridement or suturing in 5%. The incidence of PRCs was 21% overall and was 42% after resection, 26% after drainage, and 4% after NOM. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for PRC were other intra-abdominal injury (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.16–15.28), low volume (OR, 2.88; 1.65, 5.06), and penetrating injury (OR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.80–6.58). Resection was very close to significance (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 0.97–4.34) (p = 0.0584). CONCLUSION: The incidence of PRCs is significant after LGPIs. Patients who undergo pancreatic resection have PRC rates equivalent to patients resected for high-grade pancreatic injuries. Those who underwent surgical drainage had slightly lower PRC rate, but only 4% of those who underwent NOM had PRCs. In patients with LGPIs, resection should be avoided. The NOM strategy should be used whenever possible and studied prospectively, particularly in penetrating trauma.
KW - Pancreas
KW - cholangiopancreatography
KW - pancreatectomy
KW - trauma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120833934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120833934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003293
DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000003293
M3 - Article
C2 - 34039927
AN - SCOPUS:85120833934
SN - 2163-0755
VL - 91
SP - 820
EP - 828
JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
IS - 5
ER -